} finally {
      interruptenator.shutdown();
      Thread.interrupted();
    }
  }

  /**
   * awaitFullGc() is not quite as reliable a way to ensure calling of a specific finalize method as
   * the more direct await* methods, but should be reliable enough in practice to avoid flakiness of
   * this test. (And if it isn't, we'd like to know about it first!)
   */
  public void testAwaitFullGc() {

    } finally {
      interruptenator.shutdown();
      Thread.interrupted();
    }
  }

  /**
   * awaitFullGc() is not quite as reliable a way to ensure calling of a specific finalize method as
   * the more direct await* methods, but should be reliable enough in practice to avoid flakiness of
   * this test. (And if it isn't, we'd like to know about it first!)
   */
  public void testAwaitFullGc() {

     * opened if it is not and should be closed with {@link #close()} when no longer
     * needed.
     *
     * Closing the context should cancel a pending notify request, but that does not seem to work reliable in all
     * implementations.
     *
     * Changes in between these calls (as long as the file is open) are buffered by the server, so iteratively calling

 * the return type. For this case, we provide a more expensive workaround in {@code
 * JdkFutureAdapters}. However, when possible, it is more efficient and reliable to create a {@code
 * ListenableFuture} directly.
 *
 * @author Sven Mawson
 * @author Nishant Thakkar
 * @since 1.0
 */
/*
 * Some of the annotations below were added after we released our separate

    @DisplayName("MonotonicClock elapsed time should increase")
    void testElapsedTime() throws InterruptedException {
        Duration initial = MonotonicClock.elapsed();
        Thread.sleep(50); // Longer delay for more reliable measurement
        Duration later = MonotonicClock.elapsed();

        assertTrue(later.compareTo(initial) > 0, "Elapsed time should increase");
        assertTrue(
                later.minus(initial).toMillis() >= 45,

 * the return type. For this case, we provide a more expensive workaround in {@code
 * JdkFutureAdapters}. However, when possible, it is more efficient and reliable to create a {@code
 * ListenableFuture} directly.
 *
 * @author Sven Mawson
 * @author Nishant Thakkar
 * @since 1.0
 */
/*
 * Some of the annotations below were added after we released our separate

 * the return type. For this case, we provide a more expensive workaround in {@code
 * JdkFutureAdapters}. However, when possible, it is more efficient and reliable to create a {@code
 * ListenableFuture} directly.
 *
 * @author Sven Mawson
 * @author Nishant Thakkar
 * @since 1.0
 */
/*
 * Some of the annotations below were added after we released our separate

### Technical Risks
1. **RDMA Complexity**: Limited Java RDMA support may require JNI
2. **Multi-Channel Synchronization**: Complex thread synchronization required
3. **Persistent Handle State**: Requires reliable state persistence mechanism
4. **Backward Compatibility**: Must maintain compatibility with SMB2/SMB1

### Mitigation Strategies
1. Implement features behind configuration flags
2. Provide graceful fallback mechanisms

   *       simply switch over to use the JDK implementation wholesale if probable hash flooding is
   *       detected, sacrificing the compactness guarantee in very rare cases in exchange for much
   *       more reliable worst-case behavior.
   *   <li>null, if no entries have yet been added to the map
   * </ul>
   */
  private transient @Nullable Object table;

  /**

- **MS-SMB2 Section 3.1.5.2**: RDMA Transport Connection
- **RFC 5040**: A Remote Direct Memory Access Protocol Specification
- **RFC 5041**: Direct Data Placement over Reliable Transports

## 3. RDMA Architecture

### 3.1 RDMA Capabilities
```java
public enum RdmaCapability {
    RDMA_READ,           // Remote direct read operations