*
 * <h2>Avoid EventBus</h2>
 *
 * <p><b>We recommend against using EventBus.</b> It was designed many years ago, and newer
 * libraries offer better ways to decouple components and react to events.
 *
 * <p>To decouple components, we recommend a dependency-injection framework. For Android code, most
 * apps use <a href="https://dagger.dev">Dagger</a>. For server code, common options include <a

      this.actionWhenFirstParamIsNull = actionWhenFirstParamIsNull;
      this.actionWhenSecondParamIsNull = actionWhenSecondParamIsNull;
    }

    /** Method that decides how to react to parameters. */
    public void reactToNullParameters(@Nullable Object first, @Nullable Object second) {
      if (first == null) {
        actionWhenFirstParamIsNull.act();
      }
      if (second == null) {

      // should never reach here!
      throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
    }

    @Override
    public Entry<K, V> belowSamplesGreater() {
      // should never reach here!
      throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
    }

    @Override
    public Entry<K, V> aboveSamplesLesser() {
      // should never reach here!
      throw new UnsupportedOperationException();

          } else if (endOfInput) { // (b)
            doneEncoding = true;
          } else { // (c)
            readMoreChars();
          }
        } else if (result.isError()) {
          // Only reach here if a CharsetEncoder with non-REPLACE settings is used.
          result.throwException();
          return 0; // Not called.
        }
      }
    }
  }

  @CheckForNull
  public abstract C previous(C value);

  /**
   * Returns a signed value indicating how many nested invocations of {@link #next} (if positive) or
   * {@link #previous} (if negative) are needed to reach {@code end} starting from {@code start}.
   * For example, if {@code end = next(next(next(start)))}, then {@code distance(start, end) == 3}
   * and {@code distance(end, start) == -3}. As well, {@code distance(a, a)} is always zero.

   * than CPUs, supposing that each thread were bound to a CPU,
   * there would exist a perfect hash function mapping threads to
   * slots that eliminates collisions. When we reach capacity, we
   * search for this mapping by randomly varying the hash codes of
   * colliding threads.  Because search is random, and collisions
   * only become known via CAS failures, convergence can be slow,

   *
   * <p>The graph below would be valid input with start nodes of {@code a, f, c}. However, if {@code
   * b} were <i>also</i> a start node, then there would be multiple paths to reach {@code e} and
   * {@code h}.
   *
   * <pre>{@code
   *    a     b      c
   *   / \   / \     |
   *  /   \ /   \    |
   * d     e     f   g
   *       |
   *       |
   *       h

    int initialBufferSize = min(BUFFER_SIZE, max(128, Integer.highestOneBit(totalLen) * 2));
    // Starting with an 8k buffer, double the size of each successive buffer. Smaller buffers
    // quadruple in size until they reach 8k, to minimize the number of small reads for longer
    // streams. Buffers are retained in a deque so that there's no copying between buffers while

    return Platform.stringIsNullOrEmpty(string);
  }

  /**
   * Returns a string, of length at least {@code minLength}, consisting of {@code string} prepended
   * with as many copies of {@code padChar} as are necessary to reach that length. For example,
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>{@code padStart("7", 3, '0')} returns {@code "007"}
   *   <li>{@code padStart("2010", 3, '0')} returns {@code "2010"}
   * </ul>
   *

  @CheckForNull
  public abstract C previous(C value);

  /**
   * Returns a signed value indicating how many nested invocations of {@link #next} (if positive) or
   * {@link #previous} (if negative) are needed to reach {@code end} starting from {@code start}.
   * For example, if {@code end = next(next(next(start)))}, then {@code distance(start, end) == 3}
   * and {@code distance(end, start) == -3}. As well, {@code distance(a, a)} is always zero.