and kept doubling itself up and straightening itself out again,
so that altogether, for the first minute or two, it was as much
as she could do to hold it.

  As soon as she had made out the proper way of nursing it,
(which was to twist it up into a sort of knot, and then keep
tight hold of its right ear and left foot, so as to prevent its
undoing itself,) she carried it out into the open air.  `IF I

    future2 = null;

    /*
     * Futures should be collected even if combiner never runs. This is kind of a silly test, since
     * the combiner is almost certain to hold its own reference to the futures, and a real app would
     * hold a reference to the executor and thus to the combiner. What we really care about is that
     * the futures are released once the combiner is done running. But we happen to provide this

    future2 = null;

    /*
     * Futures should be collected even if combiner never runs. This is kind of a silly test, since
     * the combiner is almost certain to hold its own reference to the futures, and a real app would
     * hold a reference to the executor and thus to the combiner. What we really care about is that
     * the futures are released once the combiner is done running. But we happen to provide this

      Map<? extends K, ? extends V> map) {
    return new HashMap<>(map);
  }

  /**
   * Creates a {@code HashMap} instance, with a high enough "initial capacity" that it <i>should</i>
   * hold {@code expectedSize} elements without growth. This behavior cannot be broadly guaranteed,
   * but it is observed to be true for OpenJDK 1.7. It also can't be guaranteed that the method

and kept doubling itself up and straightening itself out again,
so that altogether, for the first minute or two, it was as much
as she could do to hold it.

  As soon as she had made out the proper way of nursing it,
(which was to twist it up into a sort of knot, and then keep
tight hold of its right ear and left foot, so as to prevent its
undoing itself,) she carried it out into the open air.  `IF I