And if the server is restarted (for example after updates, or migrations from the cloud provider) you probably **won't notice it**. And because of that, you won't even know that you have to restart the process manually. So, your API will just stay dead. 😱

### Run Automatically on Startup

  if seen[key] == 3:
    p.text += (
        "\n      Since there were three failures, this is not flaky, and it"
    )
    p.text += "\n      probably caused the Kokoro invocation to fail."
  else:
    p.text += (
        "\n      Since there were not three failures, this is probably a flake."
    )
    p.text += (
        "\n      Flakes make this pkg/pip_and_nonpip_tests target show "
        "as failing,"
    )

    * If you are comparing Uvicorn, compare it against Daphne, Hypercorn, uWSGI, etc. Application servers.
* **Starlette**:
    * Will have the next best performance, after Uvicorn. In fact, Starlette uses Uvicorn to run. So, it probably can only get "slower" than Uvicorn by having to execute more code.
    * But it provides you the tools to build simple web applications, with routing based on paths, etc.

 *   <li>While a dependency on Android ought to be easy if it's for annotations only, it will
 *       probably require adding the dep to various ACLs, license files, and Proguard
 *       configurations, and there's always the potential that something will go wrong. It
 *       <i>probably</i> won't, since the deps are needed only in tests (and maybe someday in
 *       testlib), but why bother?

---> 100%
```

</div>

#### Generate Client Code

To generate the client code you can use the command line application `openapi-ts` that would now be installed.

Because it is installed in the local project, you probably wouldn't be able to call that command directly, but you would put it on your `package.json` file.

It could look like this:

```JSON  hl_lines="7"
{
  "name": "frontend-app",
  "version": "1.0.0",

The process that happens when your API app calls the *external API* is named a "callback". Because the software that the external developer wrote sends a request to your API and then your API *calls back*, sending a request to an *external API* (that was probably created by the same developer).

If something seems interesting and useful to your project, go ahead and check it, but otherwise, you might probably just skip them.

!!! tip

 *   <li>While a dependency on Android ought to be easy if it's for annotations only, it will
 *       probably require adding the dep to various ACLs, license files, and Proguard
 *       configurations, and there's always the potential that something will go wrong. It
 *       <i>probably</i> won't, since the deps are needed only in tests (and maybe someday in
 *       testlib), but why bother?

   * could use null, but that messes with our nullness checking, including under J2KT. We could
   * probably work around it by changing how we annotate the J2CL EnumMap, but that's probably more
   * trouble than just using Object.class.)
   *
   * Then we declare the getters for these fields as @GwtIncompatible so that no one can try to use

/*
 * @Ignore affects the Android test runner (and only the Android test runner): It respects JUnit 4
 * annotations even on JUnit 3 tests.
 *
 * TODO(b/225350400): Remove @Ignore, which doesn't seem like it should be necessary and probably
 * soon won't be.
 */
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
@Ignore
public final class MyTester extends AbstractTester<@Nullable Void> {
  static int timesTestClassWasRun = 0;