[![PyPI](https://badge.fury.io/py/tensorflow.svg)](https://badge.fury.io/py/tensorflow)
[![DOI](https://zenodo.org/badge/DOI/10.5281/zenodo.4724125.svg)](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4724125)
[![CII Best Practices](https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/projects/1486/badge)](https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/projects/1486)

    non-backward-compatible API changes without a major release. Reviewers of
    your pull request will comment on any API compatibility issues
    [following API review practices](https://github.com/tensorflow/community/blob/master/governance/api-reviews.md).
*   When you contribute a new feature to TensorFlow, the maintenance burden is

See `istio/manifests/charts` for details about the new charts and why they were created. Briefly, the new charts
are intended to support production ready deployments of Istio that follow best practices like canarying for upgrade.

## Terminology

Throughout the document, the following terms are used:

- `IstioOperatorSpec`: The API directly defined in the

patents or other property right claims or to contest validity of any
such claims; this section has the sole purpose of protecting the
integrity of the free software distribution system which is
implemented by public license practices.  Many people have made
generous contributions to the wide range of software distributed
through that system in reliance on consistent application of that
system; it is up to the author/donor to decide if he or she is willing

patents or other property right claims or to contest validity of any
such claims; this section has the sole purpose of protecting the
integrity of the free software distribution system, which is implemented
by public license practices. Many people have made generous
contributions to the wide range of software distributed through that
system in reliance on consistent application of that system; it is up to

   *
   * <p>The default implementation throws {@code NoSuchElementException}.
   *
   * @return the minimum value of type {@code C}; never null
   * @throws NoSuchElementException if the type has no (practical) minimum value; for example,
   *     {@link java.math.BigInteger}
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public C minValue() {
    throw new NoSuchElementException();
  }

  /**

 * hint, so this technique may fail at the whim of the JDK implementation, for example if a user
 * specified the JVM flag {@code -XX:+DisableExplicitGC}. But in practice, it works very well for
 * ordinary tests.
 *
 * <p>Failure of the expected event to occur within an implementation-defined "reasonable" time
 * period or an interrupt while waiting for the expected event will result in a {@link

   *
   * <p>The default implementation throws {@code NoSuchElementException}.
   *
   * @return the minimum value of type {@code C}; never null
   * @throws NoSuchElementException if the type has no (practical) minimum value; for example,
   *     {@link java.math.BigInteger}
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public C minValue() {
    throw new NoSuchElementException();
  }

  /**

 * hint, so this technique may fail at the whim of the JDK implementation, for example if a user
 * specified the JVM flag {@code -XX:+DisableExplicitGC}. But in practice, it works very well for
 * ordinary tests.
 *
 * <p>Failure of the expected event to occur within an implementation-defined "reasonable" time
 * period or an interrupt while waiting for the expected event will result in a {@link

         * large that doing the lookup is noticeably slower than redoing the work would be.
         *
         * Ideally we'd have a real eviction policy, but until we see a problem in practice, I hope
         * that this will suffice. I have not even benchmarked with different size limits.
         */
        if (validClasses.size() > 1000) {
          validClasses.clear();
        }