}
  }

  //////// Implementation /////////

  private static final LazyLogger logger = new LazyLogger(CycleDetectingLockFactory.class);

  final Policy policy;

  private CycleDetectingLockFactory(Policy policy) {
    this.policy = checkNotNull(policy);
  }

  /**
   * Tracks the currently acquired locks for each Thread, kept up to date by calls to {@link

      Policy.setPolicy(policy);

      try {
        r.run();
      } finally {
        policy.addPermission(new SecurityPermission("setPolicy"));
        Policy.setPolicy(savedPolicy);
      }
    }
  }

  /** Runs a runnable without any permissions. */
  public void runWithoutPermissions(Runnable r) {
    runWithPermissions(r);
  }

      Policy.setPolicy(policy);

      try {
        r.run();
      } finally {
        policy.addPermission(new SecurityPermission("setPolicy"));
        Policy.setPolicy(savedPolicy);
      }
    }
  }

  /** Runs a runnable without any permissions. */
  public void runWithoutPermissions(Runnable r) {
    runWithPermissions(r);
  }

  private <E extends Enum<E>>
      CycleDetectingLockFactory.WithExplicitOrdering<E> newInstanceWithExplicitOrdering(
          Class<E> enumClass, Policy policy) {
    return new CycleDetectingLockFactory.WithExplicitOrdering<E>(
        policy, CycleDetectingLockFactory.createNodes(enumClass));
  }

  public void testDeadlock_twoLocks() {
    // Establish an acquisition order of lockA -> lockB.
    lockA.lock();

  /**
   * Creates a monitor with a non-fair (but fast) ordering policy. Equivalent to {@code
   * Monitor(false)}.
   */
  public Monitor() {
    this(false);
  }

  /**
   * Creates a monitor with the given ordering policy.
   *
   * @param fair whether this monitor should use a fair ordering policy rather than a non-fair (but
   *     fast) one
   */
  public Monitor(boolean fair) {

# This workflow uses actions that are not certified by GitHub. They are provided
# by a third-party and are governed by separate terms of service, privacy
# policy, and support documentation.

name: Scorecard supply-chain security
on:
  # For Branch-Protection check. Only the default branch is supported. See
  # https://github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#branch-protection
  branch_protection_rule:

@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public final class Queues {
  private Queues() {}

  // ArrayBlockingQueue

  /**
   * Creates an empty {@code ArrayBlockingQueue} with the given (fixed) capacity and nonfair access
   * policy.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // ArrayBlockingQueue
  public static <E> ArrayBlockingQueue<E> newArrayBlockingQueue(int capacity) {
    return new ArrayBlockingQueue<>(capacity);
  }

@GwtIncompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public interface RangeMap<K extends Comparable, V> {
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): These docs sometimes say "map" and sometimes say "range map." Pick one, or at
   * least decide on a policy for when to use which.
   */

  /**
   * Returns the value associated with the specified key, or {@code null} if there is no such value.
   *

public final class NullPointerTester {

  private final ClassToInstanceMap<Object> defaults = MutableClassToInstanceMap.create();
  private final List<Member> ignoredMembers = Lists.newArrayList();

  private ExceptionTypePolicy policy = ExceptionTypePolicy.NPE_OR_UOE;

  public NullPointerTester() {
    try {
      /*
       * Converter.apply has a non-nullable parameter type but doesn't throw for null arguments. For

   * if occurrences == 0. This satisfies both NullPointerTester and
   * CollectionRemoveTester.testRemove_nullAllowed, but it's not clear that it's
   * a good policy, especially because, in order for the test to pass, the
   * parameter must be misleadingly annotated as @Nullable. I suspect that
   * we'll want to remove @Nullable, add an eager checkNotNull, and loosen up