}

  /**
   * Returns an immutable array containing the given values, in order.
   *
   * <p><b>Performance note:</b> this method delegates to {@link #copyOf(Collection)} if {@code
   * values} is a {@link Collection}. Otherwise it creates a {@link #builder} and uses {@link
   * Builder#addAll(Iterable)}, with all the performance implications associated with that.
   */
  public static ImmutableIntArray copyOf(Iterable<Integer> values) {

  }

  /**
   * Returns an immutable array containing the given values, in order.
   *
   * <p><b>Performance note:</b> this method delegates to {@link #copyOf(Collection)} if {@code
   * values} is a {@link Collection}. Otherwise it creates a {@link #builder} and uses {@link
   * Builder#addAll(Iterable)}, with all the performance implications associated with that.
   */
  public static ImmutableDoubleArray copyOf(Iterable<Double> values) {

      this.safeMinChar = (char) safeMin;
      this.safeMaxChar = (char) Math.min(safeMax, Character.MIN_HIGH_SURROGATE - 1);
    }
  }

  /*
   * This is overridden to improve performance. Rough benchmarking shows that this almost doubles
   * the speed when processing strings that do not require any escaping.
   */
  @Override
  public final String escape(String s) {

 * {@link Multiset#entrySet()}, as do many methods acting on the set returned by {@link
 * #elementSet()}. Override those methods for better performance.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
abstract class AbstractSortedMultiset<E extends @Nullable Object> extends AbstractMultiset<E>

 *   <li>equalsImpl: which implementation of array equality to use
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p><b>Important note:</b> the primary goal of this benchmark is to ensure that varying {@code
 * whereToDiffer} produces no observable change in performance. We want to make sure that the array
 * equals implementation is *not* short-circuiting to prevent timing-based attacks. Being fast is
 * only a secondary goal.
 *
 * @author Kurt Alfred Kluever
 */

 *   <li>equalsImpl: which implementation of array equality to use
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p><b>Important note:</b> the primary goal of this benchmark is to ensure that varying {@code
 * whereToDiffer} produces no observable change in performance. We want to make sure that the array
 * equals implementation is *not* short-circuiting to prevent timing-based attacks. Being fast is
 * only a secondary goal.
 *
 * @author Kurt Alfred Kluever
 */

 *
 * <p><b>Note:</b> {@code ComparisonChain} instances are <b>immutable</b>. For this utility to work
 * correctly, calls must be chained as illustrated above.
 *
 * <p>Performance note: Even though the {@code ComparisonChain} caller always invokes its {@code
 * compare} methods unconditionally, the {@code ComparisonChain} implementation stops calling its

 *
 * <p>In order to allow proper garbage collection of unused locks, the edges of the lock graph are
 * weak references.
 *
 * <p><strong>Performance</strong>
 *
 * <p>The extra bookkeeping done by cycle detecting locks comes at some cost to performance.
 * Benchmarks (as of December 2011) show that:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>for an unnested {@code lock()} and {@code unlock()}, a cycle detecting lock takes 38ns as

    }
    boolean[] octets = new boolean[maxChar + 1];
    for (char c : safeCharArray) {
      octets[c] = true;
    }
    return octets;
  }

  /*
   * Overridden for performance. For unescaped strings this improved the performance of the uri
   * escaper from ~760ns to ~400ns as measured by {@link CharEscapersBenchmark}.
   */
  @Override
  protected int nextEscapeIndex(CharSequence csq, int index, int end) {

/**
 * Provides similar behavior to {@link String#intern} for any immutable type. Common implementations
 * are available from the {@link Interners} class.
 *
 * <p>Note that {@code String.intern()} has some well-known performance limitations, and should
 * generally be avoided. Prefer {@link Interners#newWeakInterner} or another {@code Interner}
 * implementation even for {@code String} interning.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @since 3.0