have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

<inherits name="com.google.common.annotations.Annotations" />
<inherits name="com.google.common.base.Base" />
<inherits name="com.google.common.math.Math" />

            define its own format and semantics. This was generally a properties format.
            <p>Since Maven 3.2.4, the type for this field has been changed to Properties to match the de-facto
            format.
            <p>Each toolchain defines its own properties names and semantics.
          </description>
        </field>
        <field>

    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

<inherits name="com.google.common.annotations.Annotations" />
<inherits name="com.google.common.base.Base" />
<inherits name="com.google.common.collect.Collect" />

            The type of artifact this project produces, for example {@code jar},
              {@code war},
              {@code ear},
              {@code pom}.
            Plugins can create their own packaging, and
            therefore their own packaging types,
            so this list does not contain all possible types.
          </description>
          <type>String</type>
          <defaultValue>jar</defaultValue>
        </field>

            <!-- Even after we stop using JSR305 annotations in our own code, we'll want this link so that NullPointerTester's docs can link to @CheckForNull and friends... at least once we start using this config for guava-testlib. -->
            <offlineLink>

            lines could make c.g.c.base.testModule transitively inherit from extra modules. If some
            of those modules are ones that it uses but forgets to list in its own <inherits>, we'd
            like to get an error. Currently we do, but if we add the extra <inherits> lines, we
            won't.

          <version>2.7.2</version>
          <configuration>
            <includes>
              <include>${test.include}</include>
            </includes>
            <!-- By having our own entries here, we also override the default exclusion filter, which excludes all nested classes. -->
            <excludes>
              <!-- https://github.com/google/guava/issues/2840 -->

            <!-- Even after we stop using JSR305 annotations in our own code, we'll want this link so that NullPointerTester's docs can link to @CheckForNull and friends... at least once we start using this config for guava-testlib. -->
            <offlineLink>

          </association>
          <comment>
            This may be removed or relocated in the near
            future. It is undecided whether plugins really need a remote
            repository set of their own.
          </comment>
        </field>
        <field xdoc.separator="blank">
          <name>profiles</name>
          <version>1.0.0+</version>
          <description>

          </association>
          <comment><![CDATA[ This may be removed or relocated in the near
            future. It is undecided whether plugins really need a remote
            repository set of their own. ]]></comment>
        </field>
      </fields>
    </class>
    <class>
      <name>Activation</name>
      <version>1.0.0</version>
      <description><![CDATA[