@CollectionFeature.Require({SUPPORTS_ITERATOR_REMOVE, KNOWN_ORDER})
  public void testRemovingIteratorKnownOrder() {
    new IteratorTester<E>(
        4,
        MODIFIABLE,
        getSubjectGenerator().order(Arrays.asList(e0(), e1(), e1(), e2())),
        IteratorTester.KnownOrder.KNOWN_ORDER) {
      @Override
      protected Iterator<E> newTargetIterator() {

      for (Integer j : IN_ORDER_VALUES) {
        assertFalse(range.contains(j));
      }
    }
  }

  public void testCreateEmptyRangeOpenClosedSucceeds() {
    for (Integer i : IN_ORDER_VALUES) {
      GeneralRange<@Nullable Integer> range = GeneralRange.range(ORDERING, i, OPEN, i, CLOSED);
      for (Integer j : IN_ORDER_VALUES) {
        assertFalse(range.contains(j));
      }
    }
  }

  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(absent = KNOWN_ORDER, value = SUPPORTS_ITERATOR_REMOVE)
  public void testIterator_unknownOrderRemoveSupported() {
    runIteratorTest(MODIFIABLE, IteratorTester.KnownOrder.UNKNOWN_ORDER, getSampleElements());
  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(absent = {KNOWN_ORDER, SUPPORTS_ITERATOR_REMOVE})

  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(absent = KNOWN_ORDER, value = SUPPORTS_ITERATOR_REMOVE)
  public void testIterator_unknownOrderRemoveSupported() {
    runIteratorTest(MODIFIABLE, IteratorTester.KnownOrder.UNKNOWN_ORDER, getSampleElements());
  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(absent = {KNOWN_ORDER, SUPPORTS_ITERATOR_REMOVE})

  @CollectionFeature.Require({SUPPORTS_ITERATOR_REMOVE, KNOWN_ORDER})
  public void testRemovingIteratorKnownOrder() {
    new IteratorTester<E>(
        4,
        MODIFIABLE,
        getSubjectGenerator().order(Arrays.asList(e0(), e1(), e1(), e2())),
        IteratorTester.KnownOrder.KNOWN_ORDER) {
      @Override
      protected Iterator<E> newTargetIterator() {

   * they were inserted into the builder. For example, in the above example, {@code
   * WORD_TO_INT.entrySet()} is guaranteed to iterate over the entries in the order {@code "one"=1,
   * "two"=2, "three"=3}, and {@code keySet()} and {@code values()} respect the same order. If you
   * want a different order, consider using {@link #orderEntriesByValue(Comparator)}, which changes

    }

    public void setOrder_Equal(Integer order) {
        setOrder_Term(order, null);
    }

    public void setOrder_Equal(Integer order, ConditionOptionCall<TermQueryBuilder> opLambda) {
        setOrder_Term(order, opLambda);
    }

    public void setOrder_Term(Integer order) {
        setOrder_Term(order, null);
    }

    public void setOrder_Term(Integer order, ConditionOptionCall<TermQueryBuilder> opLambda) {

      for (Integer j : IN_ORDER_VALUES) {
        assertFalse(range.contains(j));
      }
    }
  }

  public void testCreateEmptyRangeOpenClosedSucceeds() {
    for (Integer i : IN_ORDER_VALUES) {
      GeneralRange<@Nullable Integer> range = GeneralRange.range(ORDERING, i, OPEN, i, CLOSED);
      for (Integer j : IN_ORDER_VALUES) {
        assertFalse(range.contains(j));
      }
    }
  }

      }

      @Override
      public List<String> order(List<String> insertionOrder) {
        List<String> order = Lists.newArrayList();
        for (String s : insertionOrder) {
          int index = order.indexOf(s);
          if (index == -1) {
            order.add(s);
          } else {
            order.add(index, s);
          }
        }
        return order;
      }
    };
  }

  public void testCreate() {

   * dispatching an event, guaranteeing that all events posted on a single thread are dispatched to
   * all subscribers in the order they are posted.
   *
   * <p>When all subscribers are dispatched to using a <i>direct</i> executor (which dispatches on
   * the same thread that posts the event), this yields a breadth-first dispatch order on each
   * thread. That is, all subscribers to a single event A will be called before any subscribers to