Column  Column
	Desc    bool
	Reorder bool
}

type OrderBy struct {
	Columns    []OrderByColumn
	Expression Expression
}

// Name where clause name
func (orderBy OrderBy) Name() string {
	return "ORDER BY"
}

// Build build where clause
func (orderBy OrderBy) Build(builder Builder) {
	if orderBy.Expression != nil {
		orderBy.Expression.Build(builder)
	} else {
		for idx, column := range orderBy.Columns {

			}},
			"SELECT * FROM `users` ORDER BY `users`.`id` DESC", nil,
		},
		{
			[]clause.Interface{
				clause.Select{}, clause.From{}, clause.OrderBy{
					Columns: []clause.OrderByColumn{{Column: clause.PrimaryColumn, Desc: true}},
				}, clause.OrderBy{
					Columns: []clause.OrderByColumn{{Column: clause.Column{Name: "name"}}},
				},
			},
			"SELECT * FROM `users` ORDER BY `users`.`id` DESC,`name`", nil,
		},
		{

  @CollectionFeature.Require({SUPPORTS_ITERATOR_REMOVE, KNOWN_ORDER})
  public void testRemovingIteratorKnownOrder() {
    new IteratorTester<E>(
        4,
        MODIFIABLE,
        getSubjectGenerator().order(Arrays.asList(e0(), e1(), e1(), e2())),
        IteratorTester.KnownOrder.KNOWN_ORDER) {
      @Override
      protected Iterator<E> newTargetIterator() {

        this.docId = value;
    }

    public Integer getOrder() {
        checkSpecifiedProperty("order");
        return order;
    }

    public void setOrder(Integer value) {
        registerModifiedProperty("order");
        this.order = value;
    }

    public String getQueryId() {
        checkSpecifiedProperty("queryId");
        return convertEmptyToNull(queryId);

        .withFeatures(
            CollectionFeature.GENERAL_PURPOSE, CollectionFeature.KNOWN_ORDER, CollectionSize.ANY)
        .suppressing(suppressForLinkedBlockingQueue())
        .createTestSuite();
  }

  // Not specifying KNOWN_ORDER for PriorityQueue and PriorityBlockingQueue
  // even though they do have it, because our tests interpret KNOWN_ORDER to
  // also mean that the iterator returns the head element first, which those
  // don't.

      for (Integer j : IN_ORDER_VALUES) {
        assertFalse(range.contains(j));
      }
    }
  }

  public void testCreateEmptyRangeOpenClosedSucceeds() {
    for (Integer i : IN_ORDER_VALUES) {
      GeneralRange<@Nullable Integer> range = GeneralRange.range(ORDERING, i, OPEN, i, CLOSED);
      for (Integer j : IN_ORDER_VALUES) {
        assertFalse(range.contains(j));
      }
    }
  }

        .withFeatures(
            CollectionFeature.GENERAL_PURPOSE, CollectionFeature.KNOWN_ORDER, CollectionSize.ANY)
        .suppressing(suppressForLinkedBlockingQueue())
        .createTestSuite();
  }

  // Not specifying KNOWN_ORDER for PriorityQueue and PriorityBlockingQueue
  // even though they do have it, because our tests interpret KNOWN_ORDER to
  // also mean that the iterator returns the head element first, which those
  // don't.

      }

      @Override
      public List<String> order(List<String> insertionOrder) {
        List<String> order = Lists.newArrayList();
        for (String s : insertionOrder) {
          int index = order.indexOf(s);
          if (index == -1) {
            order.add(s);
          } else {
            order.add(index, s);
          }
        }
        return order;
      }
    };
  }

  public void testCreate() {

 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>does not allow parallel edges
 *   <li>does not allow self-loops
 *   <li>orders {@link Network#nodes()} and {@link Network#edges()} in the order in which the
 *       elements were added (insertion order)
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>{@code Network}s built by this class also guarantee that each collection-returning accessor
 * returns a <b>(live) unmodifiable view</b>; see <a

  @CollectionFeature.Require({SUPPORTS_ITERATOR_REMOVE, KNOWN_ORDER})
  public void testRemovingIteratorKnownOrder() {
    new IteratorTester<E>(
        4,
        MODIFIABLE,
        getSubjectGenerator().order(Arrays.asList(e0(), e1(), e1(), e2())),
        IteratorTester.KnownOrder.KNOWN_ORDER) {
      @Override
      protected Iterator<E> newTargetIterator() {