* The returned list may contain a mix of Java class-path, Java module-path, and other types of path elements.
     *
     * @return the paths of all dependencies
     */
    @Nonnull
    List<Path> getPaths();

    /**
     * Returns the file paths of all dependencies, dispatched according the tool options where to place them.

    /**
     * Artifact type name for a JAR file containing test classes. If the main artifact is placed on the class-path
     * ({@value #JAR} or {@value #CLASSPATH_JAR} types), then the test artifact will also be placed on the class-path.
     * Otherwise, if the main artifact is placed on the module-path ({@value #JAR} or {@value #MODULAR_JAR} types),

     * So the modular test output directory usually needs to be placed in a {@code --path-module} option.
     *
     * <ul>
     *   <li>If the test output directory is modular, then:
     *     <ul>
     *       <li>If a test module name is identical to a main module name,
     *           place the test directory in a {@code --patch-module} option.</li>
     *       <li>Otherwise, place the test directory on the module-path. However, this case

     *
     * @param types types of path where a dependency can be placed
     * @param filter filter the paths accepted by the tool which will consume the path
     * @param path path to the JAR file or output directory of the dependency
     * @return where to place the dependency, or an empty value if the placement cannot be determined

     *
     * @param types types of path where a dependency can be placed
     * @param filter filter the paths accepted by the tool which will consume the path
     * @param path path to the JAR file or output directory of the dependency
     * @return where to place the dependency, or an empty value if the placement cannot be determined

     * So the modular test output directory usually needs to be placed in a {@code --path-module} option.
     *
     * <ul>
     *   <li>If the test output directory is modular, then:
     *     <ul>
     *       <li>If a test module name is identical to a main module name,
     *           place the test directory in a {@code --patch-module} option.</li>
     *       <li>Otherwise, place the test directory on the module-path. However, this case

     * <p><b>Context-sensitive interpretation:</b>
     * A dependency with this path type will not necessarily be placed on the class-path.
     * There are two circumstances where the dependency may nevertheless be placed somewhere else:
     * </p>
     * <ul>
     *   <li>If {@link #MODULES} path type is also set, then the dependency can be placed either on the
     *       class-path or on the module-path, but only one of those. The choice is up to the plugin,

   * overkill for most Atomics because they are usually irregularly
   * scattered in memory and thus don't interfere much with each
   * other. But Atomic objects residing in arrays will tend to be
   * placed adjacent to each other, and so will most often share
   * cache lines (with a huge negative performance impact) without
   * this precaution.
   *
   * In part because Cells are relatively large, we avoid creating

 *
 * @see org.apache.maven.api.services.DependencyResolverResult#getDispatchedPaths()
 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 */
@Experimental
public interface PathType {
    /**
     * The type for all paths that could not be placed in any of the types requested by a caller.
     * This type can appear in the return value of a call to
     * {@link Session#resolveDependencies resolveDependencies(...)} when at least one dependency

dependencies and the dependencies are solved based on the declared types. So, it's not possible to declare more than one "component" that provides a certain type.

Routes are declared in a single place, using functions declared in other places (instead of using decorators that can be placed right on top of the function that handles the endpoint). This is closer to how Django does it than to how Flask (and Starlette) does it. It separates in the code things that are relatively tightly coupled....