combiner = null;
    // combiner should be collected even if the future it returns never completes.
    GcFinalization.awaitClear(combinerRef);
  }

  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): maybe pass around TestFuture instances instead of
   * ListenableFuture instances
   */

  /**
   * A future in {@link TestFutureBatch} that also has a name for debugging purposes and a {@code

came skimming out, straight at the Footman's head:  it just
grazed his nose, and broke to pieces against one of the trees
behind him.

  `--or next day, maybe,' the Footman continued in the same tone,
exactly as if nothing had happened.

  `How am I to get in?' asked Alice again, in a louder tone.

  `ARE you to get in at all?' said the Footman.  `That's the

    assertSame(t, popLoggedThrowable());
  }

  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): Can we replace makeLocalCache with a call to builder.build()? Some tests may
   * need access to LocalCache APIs, but maybe we can at least make makeLocalCache use
   * builder.build() and then cast?
   */

  private static <K, V> LocalCache<K, V> makeLocalCache(
      CacheBuilder<? super K, ? super V> builder) {

    assertSame(t, popLoggedThrowable());
  }

  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): Can we replace makeLocalCache with a call to builder.build()? Some tests may
   * need access to LocalCache APIs, but maybe we can at least make makeLocalCache use
   * builder.build() and then cast?
   */

  private static <K, V> LocalCache<K, V> makeLocalCache(
      CacheBuilder<? super K, ? super V> builder) {

came skimming out, straight at the Footman's head:  it just
grazed his nose, and broke to pieces against one of the trees
behind him.

  `--or next day, maybe,' the Footman continued in the same tone,
exactly as if nothing had happened.

  `How am I to get in?' asked Alice again, in a louder tone.

  `ARE you to get in at all?' said the Footman.  `That's the

            <multiplicity>*</multiplicity>
          </association>
        </field>
      </fields>
      <comment>We could probably have a specific element for a dev mailing list for things like CI,
        and maybe even a specific element for the user and scm mailing lists. Then leave the more
        lose structure for any other type of mailing list.</comment>
      <codeSegments>
        <codeSegment>

    combiner = null;
    // combiner should be collected even if the future it returns never completes.
    GcFinalization.awaitClear(combinerRef);
  }

  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): maybe pass around TestFuture instances instead of
   * ListenableFuture instances
   */

  /**
   * A future in {@link TestFutureBatch} that also has a name for debugging purposes and a {@code

       * prototype checker's JDK. However, the checker still sees the return type as plain
       * `Enumeration<?>`, probably because of one of the following two bugs (and maybe those two
       * bugs are themselves just symptoms of the same underlying problem):
       *
       * https://github.com/typetools/checker-framework/issues/3030
       *

matchers that have a sequence of steps, where each step depends on the result of the previous step and we can stop processing as soon as a step fails. These classes provide infrastructure for writing such a sequence. Based on https://github.com/npryce/maybe-java Author: Steve Freeman 2012 http://www.hamcrest.com Nested Class Summary static interface Condition.Step<I,O> Field Summary static org.hamcrest.Condition.NotMatched<java.lang.Object> NOT_MATCHED Method Summary abstract <U> Condition<U> and(Condition.Step<?...

ApEc,GAwE1B/C,QAAQ4C,aACRyD,EAAKrG,OAALqG,CAAazD,OACbkE,EACDT,EAAKyH,QAALzH,CAAczD,MADbkE,CAEDT,EAAKrG,OAALqG,CAAa1J,SAFZmK,CAGDT,EAAKtD,SAHJ+D,EA1E0B,GAiFxBE,EAAaX,EAAKyH,QAALzH,CAAcP,SAA3BkB,GAA4C,MAA5CA,CAjFwB,CAAnC,KGwIM,UAaM,MAbN,SAkBK,CAlBL,mBAyBe,UAzBf,kBAAA,2BAAA,CApKO,OAuNN,OAEE,GAFF,WAAA,II7OT,WAAoC,IAC5BjE,GAAYsD,EAAKtD,UACjB2I,EAAgB3I,EAAUmB,KAAVnB,CAAgB,GAAhBA,EAAqB,CAArBA,IACQsD,EAAKrG,QAA3B4C,IAAAA,OAAQjG,IAAAA,UACVkI,EAAuD,CAAC,CAA9C,oBAAkBzH,OAAlB,IAEVoT,EAA4D,CAAC,CAA5C,kBAAgBp...