Sebastián Ramírez <******@****.***> 1688142182 +0200

    public static final int DCERPC_CONC_MPX = 0x10; /* supports concurrent multiplexing */
    public static final int DCERPC_DID_NOT_EXECUTE = 0x20;
    public static final int DCERPC_MAYBE = 0x40; /* `maybe' call semantics requested */
    public static final int DCERPC_OBJECT_UUID = 0x80; /* if true, a non-nil object UUID */

    return freshness.get();
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("removal") // b/321209431 -- maybe just use valueOf here?
  @Generates
  Integer generateInteger() {
    return new Integer(generateInt());
  }

  @Generates
  long generateLong() {
    return generateInt();
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("removal") // b/321209431 -- maybe just use valueOf here?
  @Generates
  Long generateLongObject() {

 * into TaskSegments. This class represents the execution context of one such task segment.
 * </p>
 * <p>
 * Wise voices have suggested that maybe aggregators shouldn't be bound to the ordinary
 * lifecycle at all, in which case we wouldn't be needing this class at all ( and
 * ProjectBuildList.getByTaskSegments). Or maybe they should be introduced in the calculation
 * of the execution plan instead, which seems much nicer.
 * </p>
 * <p>

    public static final int DCERPC_CONC_MPX        = 0x10; /* supports concurrent multiplexing */
    public static final int DCERPC_DID_NOT_EXECUTE = 0x20;
    public static final int DCERPC_MAYBE           = 0x40; /* `maybe' call semantics requested */
    public static final int DCERPC_OBJECT_UUID     = 0x80; /* if true, a non-nil object UUID */

    return freshness.get();
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("removal") // b/321209431 -- maybe just use valueOf here?
  @Generates
  Integer generateInteger() {
    return new Integer(generateInt());
  }

  @Generates
  long generateLong() {
    return generateInt();
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("removal") // b/321209431 -- maybe just use valueOf here?
  @Generates
  Long generateLongObject() {

        // TODO not sure that it should assume this, maybe the calls to addMetadata should pre-merge, then artifact
        // replaces?
        AbstractRepositoryMetadata repoMetadata = (AbstractRepositoryMetadata) metadata;
        this.metadata.merge(repoMetadata.getMetadata());
    }

    public void merge(ArtifactMetadata metadata) {
        // TODO not sure that it should assume this, maybe the calls to addMetadata should pre-merge, then artifact

abstract class ArrayListMultimapGwtSerializationDependencies<K, V>
    extends AbstractListMultimap<K, V> {
  ArrayListMultimapGwtSerializationDependencies(Map<K, Collection<V>> map) {
    super(map);
  }
  // TODO(cpovirk): Maybe I should have just one shared superclass for AbstractMultimap itself?

import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.Set;

/**
 * Optional features of classes derived from {@link Multiset}.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@SuppressWarnings("rawtypes") // maybe avoidable if we rework the whole package?
@GwtCompatible
public enum MultisetFeature implements Feature<Multiset> {
  /**
   * Indicates that elements from {@code Multiset.entrySet()} update to reflect changes in the

  popd

  # Also copy it to out/$os_arch/ztunnel as that's whats used in the build
  echo "Copying '${2}' to ${TARGET_OUT_LINUX}/ztunnel"
  cp -f "${2}" "${TARGET_OUT_LINUX}/ztunnel"
}

function maybe_build_ztunnel() {
  # TODO detect git changes or something to avoid unnecessarily building
  # BUILD_ZTUNNEL=1 with no BUILD_ZTUNNEL_REPO tries to infer BUILD_ZTUNNEL_REPO