/**
 * Tests the {@link Map} implementations of {@link java.util}, suppressing tests that trip known
 * bugs in OpenJDK 6 or higher.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 */
/*
 * TODO(cpovirk): consider renaming this class in light of our now running it
 * under JDK7
 */
public class OpenJdk6MapTests extends TestsForMapsInJavaUtil {
  public static Test suite() {
    return new OpenJdk6MapTests().allTests();
  }

  @Override

/**
 * Tests the {@link Map} implementations of {@link java.util}, suppressing tests that trip known
 * bugs in OpenJDK 6 or higher.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 */
/*
 * TODO(cpovirk): consider renaming this class in light of our now running it
 * under JDK7
 */
public class OpenJdk6MapTests extends TestsForMapsInJavaUtil {
  public static Test suite() {
    return new OpenJdk6MapTests().allTests();
  }

  @Override

   */

  @Override
  public void write(char[] cbuf, int off, int len) throws IOException {
    checkNotClosed();
    // It turns out that creating a new String is usually as fast, or faster
    // than wrapping cbuf in a light-weight CharSequence.
    target.append(new String(cbuf, off, len));
  }

  /*
   * Override a few functions for performance reasons to avoid creating unnecessary strings.
   */

  @Override

 * annotated with LargeTest.
 *
 * <p>Why use a custom annotation instead of {@code android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.Suppress}?
 * I'm not completely sure that this is the right choice, but it has various advantages:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might someday be treated by a non-Android tool as a
 *       suppression. This would follow the precedent of many of our annotation processors, which

 * annotated with LargeTest.
 *
 * <p>Why use a custom annotation instead of {@code android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.Suppress}?
 * I'm not completely sure that this is the right choice, but it has various advantages:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>An annotation named just "Suppress" might someday be treated by a non-Android tool as a
 *       suppression. This would follow the precedent of many of our annotation processors, which

    }
  }

  private static Character[] concat(Character[] left, Character[] right) {
    Character[] result = new Character[left.length + right.length];
    System.arraycopy(left, 0, result, 0, left.length);
    System.arraycopy(right, 0, result, left.length, right.length);
    return result;
  }

      return asList(all).subList(2, elements.length + 2);
    }
  }

  private static Double[] concat(Double[] left, Double[] right) {
    Double[] result = new Double[left.length + right.length];
    System.arraycopy(left, 0, result, 0, left.length);
    System.arraycopy(right, 0, result, left.length, right.length);
    return result;
  }

  public abstract static class TestDoubleListGenerator implements TestListGenerator<Double> {

    }
  }

  private static Character[] concat(Character[] left, Character[] right) {
    Character[] result = new Character[left.length + right.length];
    System.arraycopy(left, 0, result, 0, left.length);
    System.arraycopy(right, 0, result, left.length, right.length);
    return result;
  }

    this.function = checkNotNull(function);
    this.ordering = checkNotNull(ordering);
  }

  @Override
  public int compare(@ParametricNullness F left, @ParametricNullness F right) {
    return ordering.compare(function.apply(left), function.apply(right));
  }

  @Override
  public boolean equals(@CheckForNull Object object) {
    if (object == this) {
      return true;
    }
    if (object instanceof ByFunctionOrdering) {

  }

  @Override
  public int compare(@ParametricNullness T left, @ParametricNullness T right) {
    for (int i = 0; i < comparators.length; i++) {
      int result = comparators[i].compare(left, right);
      if (result != 0) {
        return result;
      }
    }
    return 0;
  }

  @Override
  public boolean equals(@CheckForNull Object object) {