* Otherwise, at least reduce <i>explicit</i> dependencies on this type by using lambda expressions
 * or method references instead of classes, leaving your code easier to migrate in the future.
 *
 * <p>To use an existing supplier instance (say, named {@code supplier}) in a context where the

 * Otherwise, at least reduce <i>explicit</i> dependencies on this type by using lambda expressions
 * or method references instead of classes, leaving your code easier to migrate in the future.
 *
 * <p>The {@link Predicates} class provides common predicates and related utilities.
 *
 * <p>See the Guava User Guide article on <a

 * Otherwise, at least reduce <i>explicit</i> dependencies on this type by using lambda expressions
 * or method references instead of classes, leaving your code easier to migrate in the future.
 *
 * <p>To use a reference of this type (say, named {@code guavaPredicate}) in a context where {@code
 * java.util.function.Predicate} is expected, use the method reference {@code

  //
  // 1. What about leaving/unlocking? Are you going to do
  //    guard.enter() paired with monitor.leave()? That might get
  //    confusing. It's nice for the finally block to look as close as
  //    possible to the thing right before the try. You could have
  //    guard.leave(), but that's a little odd as well because the
  //    guard doesn't have anything to do with leaving. You can't

 * Otherwise, at least reduce <i>explicit</i> dependencies on this type by using lambda expressions
 * or method references instead of classes, leaving your code easier to migrate in the future.
 *
 * <p>See the Guava User Guide article on <a
 * href="https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/FunctionalExplained">the use of {@code Function}</a>.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion

    period. The last release to remove non-`@Beta` APIs was Guava 21.0.) Even
    `@Deprecated` APIs will remain (again, unless they are `@Beta`). We have no
    plans to start removing things again, but officially, we're leaving our
    options open in case of surprises (like, say, a serious security problem).

3.  Guava has one dependency that is needed for linkage at runtime:
    `com.google.guava:failureaccess:1.0.2`. It also has

    testRotate(new boolean[] {true}, 1, 0, 1, new boolean[] {true});
    testRotate(new boolean[] {true}, 1, 1, 1, new boolean[] {true});

    // Rotate the central 5 elements, leaving the ends as-is
    testRotate(
        new boolean[] {false, true, false, true, false, true, false},
        -6,
        1,
        6,
        new boolean[] {false, false, true, false, true, true, false});

    testRotate(new boolean[] {true}, 1, 0, 1, new boolean[] {true});
    testRotate(new boolean[] {true}, 1, 1, 1, new boolean[] {true});

    // Rotate the central 5 elements, leaving the ends as-is
    testRotate(
        new boolean[] {false, true, false, true, false, true, false},
        -6,
        1,
        6,
        new boolean[] {false, false, true, false, true, true, false});

   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  Collection<V> removeAll(@CompatibleWith("K") @CheckForNull Object key);

  /** Removes all key-value pairs from the multimap, leaving it {@linkplain #isEmpty empty}. */
  void clear();

  // Views

  /**
   * Returns a view collection of the values associated with {@code key} in this multimap, if any.

    testRotate(new byte[] {1}, 0, 0, 1, new byte[] {1});
    testRotate(new byte[] {1}, 1, 0, 1, new byte[] {1});
    testRotate(new byte[] {1}, 1, 1, 1, new byte[] {1});

    // Rotate the central 5 elements, leaving the ends as-is
    testRotate(new byte[] {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, -6, 1, 6, new byte[] {0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 6});
    testRotate(new byte[] {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, -1, 1, 6, new byte[] {0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 6});