name: Flaking Test
description: Report flaky tests or jobs in Kubernetes CI
labels: kind/flake
body:
  - type: textarea
    id: jobs
    attributes:
      label: Which jobs are flaking?
      description: |
        Please only use this template for submitting reports about flaky tests or jobs (pass or fail with no underlying change in code) in Kubernetes CI.
        Links to go.k8s.io/triage and/or links to specific failures in spyglass are appreciated.

}

// Replacer replacer interface like strings.Replacer
type Replacer interface {
	Replace(name string) string
}

var _ Namer = (*NamingStrategy)(nil)

// NamingStrategy tables, columns naming strategy
type NamingStrategy struct {
	TablePrefix         string
	SingularTable       bool
	NameReplacer        Replacer
	NoLowerCase         bool
	IdentifierMaxLength int
}

	LockingOptionsNoWait     = "NOWAIT"
)

type Locking struct {
	Strength string
	Table    Table
	Options  string
}

// Name where clause name
func (locking Locking) Name() string {
	return "FOR"
}

// Build build where clause
func (locking Locking) Build(builder Builder) {
	builder.WriteString(locking.Strength)
	if locking.Table.Name != "" {
		builder.WriteString(" OF ")

mohammad ali <******@****.***> 1685412048 -0700

		Result  string
		Vars    []interface{}
	}{
		{
			[]clause.Interface{clause.Select{}, clause.From{}, clause.Locking{Strength: clause.LockingStrengthUpdate}},
			"SELECT * FROM `users` FOR UPDATE", nil,
		},
		{
			[]clause.Interface{clause.Select{}, clause.From{}, clause.Locking{Strength: clause.LockingStrengthShare, Table: clause.Table{Name: clause.CurrentTable}}},
			"SELECT * FROM `users` FOR SHARE OF `users`", nil,
		},

      - action: add-comment@v1
        args:
          comment: |
            :warning: This PR appears to be lacking tests.  Consider adding tests to cover the new functionality.

# To simplify the automations section, some calculations are placed under unique YAML keys defined here.
# Read the "|" not as "or", but as a "pipe", taking the output of the previous command and passing it to the next command.

* Why is this change done? What's the use case?
* For user facing features, what will the API look like?
* What test cases should it have? What could go wrong?
* How will it roughly be implemented? We'll happily provide code pointers to save you time.

We may ask you to answer these questions directly in the GitHub issue or (for large changes) in a shared Google Doc.

        final Iterator<? extends Entry<? extends E>> iterator1 = multiset1.entrySet().iterator();
        final Iterator<? extends Entry<? extends E>> iterator2 = multiset2.entrySet().iterator();
        // TODO(lowasser): consider making the entries live views
        return new AbstractIterator<Entry<E>>() {
          @Override
          @CheckForNull
          protected Entry<E> computeNext() {
            if (iterator1.hasNext()) {

 *       }
 *       return endOfData();
 *     }
 *   };
 * }
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <p>This class supports iterators that include null elements.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @since 2.0
 */
// When making changes to this class, please also update the copy at
// com.google.common.base.AbstractIterator
@GwtCompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault

   * java.util.TreeMap}).
   *
   * <p>Each method invocation on the set returned by this method results in exactly one method
   * invocation on the backing map or its {@code keySet} view, with one exception. The {@code
   * addAll} method is implemented as a sequence of {@code put} invocations on the backing map.
   *
   * <p>The specified map must be empty at the time this method is invoked, and should not be