import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * Signifies that a test should not be run under Android. This annotation is respected only by our
 * Google-internal Android suite generators. Note that those generators also suppress any test
 * annotated with LargeTest.
 *
 * <p>Why use a custom annotation instead of {@code android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.Suppress}?

    if (num >= 0) {
      Object[] rest = new Integer[num];
      for (int i = 0; i < num; i++) {
        rest[i] = partsArray[i + 2];
      }

      assertEquals(expected, joiner.join(partsArray[0], partsArray[1], rest));

      StringBuilder sb3 = new StringBuilder().append('x');
      joiner.appendTo(sb3, partsArray[0], partsArray[1], rest);
      assertEquals("x" + expected, sb3.toString());
    }

                    service.shutdown();
                    service.awaitTermination(terminationTimeout, timeUnit);
                  } catch (InterruptedException ignored) {
                    // We're shutting down anyway, so just ignore.
                  }
                }
              }));
    }

    @VisibleForTesting
    void addShutdownHook(Thread hook) {
      Runtime.getRuntime().addShutdownHook(hook);
    }
  }

import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;

import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals;

/**
 * A test which demonstrates maven's recursive inheritance where
 * a distinct value is taken from each parent contributing to
 * the final model of the project being assembled. There is no
 * overriding going on amongst the models being used in this test:

/** Unit test for {@link Streams}. */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public class StreamsTest extends TestCase {
  /*
   * Full and proper black-box testing of a Stream-returning method is extremely involved, and is
   * overkill when nearly all Streams are produced using well-tested JDK calls. So, we cheat and
   * just test that the toArray() contents are as expected.
   */

         *
         * So this is probably just the "Windows Java 8" case. In that case, if we wanted *another*
         * layer of fallback before consulting the system property, we could try
         * com.sun.security.auth.module.NTSystem.
         *
         * But for now, we use the value from the system property as our best guess.
         */
        return fromSystemProperty;

   *       {@code cls}:
   *       <ul>
   *         <li>Test will fail if default value for a parameter cannot be determined.
   *         <li>Test will fail if the factory method returns null so testing instance methods is
   *             impossible.
   *         <li>Test will fail if the constructor or factory method throws exception.
   *       </ul>

    assertThat(expected.getMessage()).contains("started transitioning asynchronously");
  }

  /**
   * This test is for a case where two Service.Listener callbacks for the same service would call
   * transitionService in the wrong order due to a race. Due to the fact that it is a race this test
   * isn't guaranteed to expose the issue, but it is at least likely to become flaky if the race

        return 0;
      }
      if (lhs == null) {
        // lhs (null) comes just before justAfterNull.
        // If rhs is b, lhs comes first.
        if (rhs.equals(justAfterNull)) {
          return -1;
        }
        return justAfterNull.compareTo(rhs);
      }
      if (rhs == null) {
        // rhs (null) comes just before justAfterNull.
        // If lhs is b, rhs comes first.

      T second = shuffledList.get(1);
      T third = shuffledList.get(2);
      T[] rest = shuffledList.subList(3, shuffledList.size()).toArray(emptyArray);

      assertEquals(min, ordering.min(shuffledList));
      assertEquals(min, ordering.min(shuffledList.iterator()));
      assertEquals(min, ordering.min(first, second, third, rest));
      assertEquals(min, ordering.min(min, max));
      assertEquals(min, ordering.min(max, min));