expectedString: "Profiles are identical",
		},
		{
			args:           fmt.Sprintf("profile diff demo demo --manifests %s", snapshotCharts),
			expectedString: "Profiles are identical",
		},
		{
			args:           fmt.Sprintf("profile diff openshift openshift --manifests %s", snapshotCharts),
			expectedString: "Profiles are identical",
		},
	}

	for i, c := range cases {

  }

  /**
   * Serializes and deserializes the specified object and verifies that the re-serialized object is
   * equal to the provided object, that the hashcodes are identical, and that the class of the
   * re-serialized object is identical to that of the original.
   *
   * <p><b>GWT warning:</b> Under GWT, this method simply returns its input, as proper GWT

		ignoreResources, verbose)
	if err != nil {
		return false, err
	}
	if diff != "" {
		fmt.Printf("Differences in manifests are:\n%s\n", diff)
		return false, nil
	}

	fmt.Println("Manifests are identical")
	return true, nil
}

func yamlFileFilter(path string) bool {
	return filepath.Ext(path) == YAMLSuffix
}

// compareManifestsFromDirs compares manifests from two directories

// Copyright 2018 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.

//go:build cgo

// Test that we can have two identical cgo packages in a single binary.
// No runtime test; just make sure it compiles.

package cgotest

import (
	_ "cmd/cgo/internal/test/issue23555a"
	_ "cmd/cgo/internal/test/issue23555b"

   * A word about using {@link Equivalence}, which automatically checks for {@code null} and
   * identical inputs: This sounds like it ought to be a problem here, since the goals of this class
   * include testing that {@code equals()} is reflexive and is tolerant of {@code null}. However,
   * there's no problem. The reason: {@link EqualsTester} tests {@code null} and identical inputs
   * directly against {@code equals()} rather than through the {@code Equivalence}.

  }

  /**
   * Serializes and deserializes the specified object and verifies that the re-serialized object is
   * equal to the provided object, that the hashcodes are identical, and that the class of the
   * re-serialized object is identical to that of the original.
   *
   * <p><b>GWT warning:</b> Under GWT, this method simply returns its input, as proper GWT

operator in the script should be in the "math" category, and it will be
generated in the output file `c/experimental/ops/math_ops.cc`.

Running this script should be a no-op, generating identical code other than

    }

    /**
     * Finish building an instance which also maps {@code x = x2} to {@code y = y2}. These values
     * must not both be identical to the values given in the first mapping. If only the {@code x}
     * values are identical, the transformation is vertical. If only the {@code y} values are
     * identical, the transformation is horizontal (i.e. the slope is zero).
     */
    public LinearTransformation and(double x2, double y2) {

   * A word about using {@link Equivalence}, which automatically checks for {@code null} and
   * identical inputs: This sounds like it ought to be a problem here, since the goals of this class
   * include testing that {@code equals()} is reflexive and is tolerant of {@code null}. However,
   * there's no problem. The reason: {@link EqualsTester} tests {@code null} and identical inputs
   * directly against {@code equals()} rather than through the {@code Equivalence}.

import java.io.DataInput;
import java.io.IOException;
import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;

/**
 * An extension of {@code DataInput} for reading from in-memory byte arrays; its methods offer
 * identical functionality but do not throw {@link IOException}.
 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> The caller is responsible for not attempting to read past the end of the