.build();

  /**
   * type → implementation. Inherently mutable interfaces and abstract classes are mapped to their
   * default implementations and are "new"d upon get().
   */
  private static final ConcurrentMap<Class<?>, Class<?>> implementations = Maps.newConcurrentMap();

  private static <T> void setImplementation(Class<T> type, Class<? extends T> implementation) {

          .build();

  /**
   * type → implementation. Inherently mutable interfaces and abstract classes are mapped to their
   * default implementations and are "new"d upon get().
   */
  private static final ConcurrentMap<Class<?>, Class<?>> implementations = Maps.newConcurrentMap();

  private static <T> void setImplementation(Class<T> type, Class<? extends T> implementation) {

import java.util.Set;
import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;

/**
 * This class provides a skeletal implementation of {@link Network}. It is recommended to extend
 * this class rather than implement {@link Network} directly.
 *
 * <p>The methods implemented in this class should not be overridden unless the subclass admits a
 * more efficient implementation.
 *
 * @author James Sexton
 * @param <N> Node parameter type
 * @param <E> Edge parameter type

 * asymptotics but requires O(n) memory, and a {@code PriorityQueue} implementation takes O(n log
 * k). In benchmarks, this implementation performs at least as well as either implementation, and
 * degrades more gracefully for worst-case input.
 *
 * <p>The implementation does not necessarily use a <i>stable</i> sorting algorithm; when multiple

## Proxy implementation

In its initial implementations, the ztunnel was actually implemented in 3 different ways: a bespoke Rust implementation, a bespoke Go implementation, and in Envoy.

In the end, [after evaluation](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c2123cKuYsBDpIon9FFdctWTUIMFweSjgwG7r8l3818/edit), the decision was to move forward with a Rust implementation.

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import com.google.common.primitives.Booleans;
import java.io.Serializable;
import java.util.NoSuchElementException;
import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;

/**
 * Implementation detail for the internal structure of {@link Range} instances. Represents a unique
 * way of "cutting" a "number line" (actually of instances of type {@code C}, not necessarily

 *       worse, and possibly better, than creating a mutable collection and copying it.
 *   <li>Implementations generally do not cache hash codes. If your element or key type has a slow
 *       {@code hashCode} implementation, it should cache it itself.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <h4>Example usage</h4>
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * class Foo {

    return LexicographicalComparatorHolder.PureJavaComparator.INSTANCE;
  }

  /**
   * Provides a lexicographical comparator implementation; either a Java implementation or a faster
   * implementation based on {@link Unsafe}.
   *
   * <p>Uses reflection to gracefully fall back to the Java implementation if {@code Unsafe} isn't
   * available.
   */
  @VisibleForTesting
  static class LexicographicalComparatorHolder {

   * to custom TypeVariable implementations. As a result, we need to make sure our TypeVariable
   * implementation respects symmetry. Moreover, we don't want to reconstruct a native type variable
   * {@code <A>} using our implementation unless some of its bounds have changed in resolution. This
   * avoids creating unequal TypeVariable implementation unnecessarily. When the bounds do change,

   * ImmutableEnumSet/ImmutableSortedSet, regardless of implementation type. It
   * captures their "logical contents" and they are reconstructed using public
   * static factories. This is necessary to ensure that the existence of a
   * particular implementation type is an implementation detail.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible // serialization