return e > invalidVersionType && e < lastVersionType
}

// ErasureAlgo defines common type of different erasure algorithms
type ErasureAlgo uint8

// List of currently supported erasure coding algorithms
const (
	invalidErasureAlgo ErasureAlgo = 0
	ReedSolomon        ErasureAlgo = 1
	lastErasureAlgo    ErasureAlgo = 2
)

func (e ErasureAlgo) valid() bool {

build:release_cpu_linux_base --repo_env=BAZEL_COMPILER="/usr/lib/llvm-17/bin/clang"
# Test-related settings below this point.
test:release_linux_base --build_tests_only --keep_going --test_output=errors --verbose_failures=true
test:release_linux_base --local_test_jobs=HOST_CPUS
test:release_linux_base --test_env=LD_LIBRARY_PATH
# Give only the list of failed tests at the end of the log

  /** Constructor for use by subclasses. */
  protected AbstractFuture() {}

  // Gets and Timed Gets
  //
  // * Be responsive to interruption
  // * Don't create Waiter nodes if you aren't going to park, this helps reduce contention on the
  //   waiters field.
  // * Future completion is defined by when #value becomes non-null/non SetFuture
  // * Future completion can be observed if the waiters field contains a TOMBSTONE

func (p *Package) needsPointerCheck(f *File, t ast.Expr, arg ast.Expr) bool {
	// An untyped nil does not need a pointer check, and when
	// _cgoCheckPointer returns the untyped nil the type assertion we
	// are going to insert will fail.  Easier to just skip nil arguments.
	// TODO: Note that this fails if nil is shadowed.
	if id, ok := arg.(*ast.Ident); ok && id.Name == "nil" {
		return false
	}

   * This is a big deal - we're talking factors of 2-8 in microbenchmarks, not just 10-20%. (This is
   * a hotspot optimizer bug, which should be fixed, but that's a separate, big project).
   *
   * The coding pattern above is heavily used in java.util, e.g. in ArrayList. There is a
   * RangeCheckMicroBenchmark in the JDK that was used to test this.
   *

  // result in an error response and no further processing of the
  // request. Valid values are:
  // - All: all dry run stages will be processed
  // +optional
  repeated string dryRun = 1;

  // Force is going to "force" Apply requests. It means user will
  // re-acquire conflicting fields owned by other people.
  optional bool force = 2;

  // fieldManager is a name associated with the actor or entity

	if err != nil {
		if _, ok := err.(InsufficientReadQuorum); ok {
			return objInfo, InsufficientWriteQuorum{}
		}
		return objInfo, err
	}

	// Delete marker already present we are not going to create new delete markers.
	if pinfo.ObjInfo.DeleteMarker && opts.VersionID == "" {
		pinfo.ObjInfo.Name = decodeDirObject(object)
		return pinfo.ObjInfo, nil
	}

      case 1:
        return is(sequence.charAt(0));
      case 2:
        return isEither(sequence.charAt(0), sequence.charAt(1));
      default:
        // TODO(lowasser): is it potentially worth just going ahead and building a precomputed
        // matcher?
        return new AnyOf(sequence);
    }
  }

  /**
   * Returns a {@code char} matcher that matches any BMP character not present in the given

   * This is a big deal - we're talking factors of 2-8 in microbenchmarks, not just 10-20%. (This is
   * a hotspot optimizer bug, which should be fixed, but that's a separate, big project).
   *
   * The coding pattern above is heavily used in java.util, e.g. in ArrayList. There is a
   * RangeCheckMicroBenchmark in the JDK that was used to test this.
   *

		}
	}

	if len(fanOutEntries) > 0 {
		// Fan-out requires no copying, and must be carried from original source
		// https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copy_protection so the incoming stream
		// is always going to be in-memory as we cannot re-read from what we
		// wrote to disk - since that amounts to "copying" from a "copy"
		// instead of "copying" from source, we need the stream to be seekable