Cela prendrait autant de temps pour finir avec ou sans sections (concurrence) et vous auriez effectué la même quantité de travail.

Mais dans ce cas, si pouviez amener 8 ex-serveurs/cuisiniers/devenus-nettoyeurs 👨‍🍳👨‍🍳👨‍🍳👨‍🍳👨‍🍳👨‍🍳👨‍🍳👨‍🍳, et que chacun d'eux (plus vous) pouvait prendre une zone de la maison pour la nettoyer, vous pourriez faire tout le travail en parallèle, et finir plus tôt.

    Method method;
    try {
      method = extractMethod(test);
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException e) {
      logger.finer(Platform.format("%s: including by default: %s", test, e.getMessage()));
      return true;
    }
    if (suppressedTests.contains(method)) {
      logger.finer(Platform.format("%s: excluding because it was explicitly suppressed.", test));
      return false;
    }
    TesterRequirements requirements;

    Method method;
    try {
      method = extractMethod(test);
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException e) {
      logger.finer(Platform.format("%s: including by default: %s", test, e.getMessage()));
      return true;
    }
    if (suppressedTests.contains(method)) {
      logger.finer(Platform.format("%s: excluding because it was explicitly suppressed.", test));
      return false;
    }
    TesterRequirements requirements;

     * will not be used and a network request will be made.
     *
     * @param maxAge a non-negative duration. This is stored and transmitted with [TimeUnit.SECONDS]
     *     precision; finer precision will be lost.
     */
    fun maxAge(maxAge: Duration) =
      apply {
        val maxAgeSeconds = maxAge.inWholeSeconds
        require(maxAgeSeconds >= 0) { "maxAge < 0: $maxAgeSeconds" }

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public boolean cancel(boolean mayInterruptIfRunning) {
    logger.get().log(FINER, "cancelling {0}", this);
    boolean cancelled = future.cancel(mayInterruptIfRunning);
    if (cancelled) {
      close();
    }
    return cancelled;
  }

  private void close() {
    logger.get().log(FINER, "closing {0}", this);
    closeables.close();
  }

  <dd>
    <p><!-- https://go.dev/issue/61758 -->
      The new <a href="/pkg/testing/slogtest#Run"><code>Run</code></a> function uses sub-tests to run test cases,
      providing finer-grained control.
    </p>
  </dd>
</dl><!-- testing/slogtest -->

<h2 id="ports">Ports</h2>

<h3 id="darwin">Darwin</h3>
<p><!-- CL 461697 -->

* The 'scheduling_latency_seconds' metric into has been split into finer steps (predicate, priority, preemption). ([#65306](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/65306), [@shyamjvs](https://github.com/shyamjvs))

* Corrected a mistake in the documentation for wait.PollImmediate(...) ([#65026](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/65026), [@spew](https://github.com/spew))
* Split 'scheduling_latency_seconds' metric into finer steps (predicate, priority, premption) ([#65306](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/65306), [@shyamjvs](https://github.com/shyamjvs))

pkg debug/elf, const DF_TEXTREL DynFlag
pkg debug/elf, const DT_BIND_NOW DynTag
pkg debug/elf, const DT_DEBUG DynTag
pkg debug/elf, const DT_ENCODING DynTag
pkg debug/elf, const DT_FINI DynTag
pkg debug/elf, const DT_FINI_ARRAY DynTag
pkg debug/elf, const DT_FINI_ARRAYSZ DynTag
pkg debug/elf, const DT_FLAGS DynTag
pkg debug/elf, const DT_HASH DynTag
pkg debug/elf, const DT_HIOS DynTag
pkg debug/elf, const DT_HIPROC DynTag

pkg debug/elf, const DF_TEXTREL = 4
pkg debug/elf, const DT_BIND_NOW = 24
pkg debug/elf, const DT_DEBUG = 21
pkg debug/elf, const DT_ENCODING = 32
pkg debug/elf, const DT_FINI = 13
pkg debug/elf, const DT_FINI_ARRAY = 26
pkg debug/elf, const DT_FINI_ARRAYSZ = 28
pkg debug/elf, const DT_FLAGS = 30
pkg debug/elf, const DT_HASH = 4
pkg debug/elf, const DT_HIOS = 1879044096
pkg debug/elf, const DT_HIPROC = 2147483647