have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

<inherits name="com.google.common.annotations.Annotations" />
<inherits name="com.google.common.base.Base" />
<inherits name="com.google.common.math.Math" />

  </dependencies>
  <build>
    <resources>
      <resource>
        <directory>..</directory>
        <includes>
          <include>LICENSE</include> <!-- copied from the parent pom because I couldn't figure out a way to make combine.children="append" work -->
          <include>proguard/*</include>
        </includes>
        <targetPath>META-INF</targetPath>
      </resource>
    </resources>
    <plugins>

  </dependencies>
  <build>
    <resources>
      <resource>
        <directory>..</directory>
        <includes>
          <include>LICENSE</include> <!-- copied from the parent pom because I couldn't figure out a way to make combine.children="append" work -->
          <include>proguard/*</include>
        </includes>
        <targetPath>META-INF</targetPath>
      </resource>
    </resources>
    <plugins>

          <description>The name of the file that must exist to activate the profile.</description>
        </field>
      </fields>
    </class>
    <!--
    This can be put back in when we figure out how to have multiple model versions
    <class>
      <name>ActivationCustom</name>
      <version>4.1.0+</version>

                     pass -XepCompilingTestOnlyCode, and that argument needs to
                     be passed as part of the same <arg> as -Xplugin:ErrorProne,
                     and I gave up trying to figure out how to do that for test
                     compilation only. -->
                <arg>-Xplugin:ErrorProne -Xep:NullArgumentForNonNullParameter:OFF -Xep:Java8ApiChecker:ERROR</arg>

specific language governing permissions and limitations
under the License.
-->

<project>
    <modelVersion>4.9.1</modelVersion>
    <groupId>tests.project</groupId>
    <artifactId>future-model-version</artifactId>
    <version>1</version>

    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

<inherits name="com.google.common.annotations.Annotations" />
<inherits name="com.google.common.base.Base" />
<inherits name="com.google.common.collect.Collect" />

		</postConstruct>
		<postConstruct name="addIndexConfig">
			<arg>"fess_config.elevate_word_to_label/elevate_word_to_label"</arg>
		</postConstruct>
		<postConstruct name="addIndexConfig">
			<arg>"fess_config.failure_url/failure_url"</arg>
		</postConstruct>
		<postConstruct name="addIndexConfig">
			<arg>"fess_config.file_authentication/file_authentication"</arg>
		</postConstruct>
		<postConstruct name="addIndexConfig">

          <association>
            <type>Repository</type>
            <multiplicity>*</multiplicity>
          </association>
          <comment>
            This may be removed or relocated in the near
            future. It is undecided whether plugins really need a remote
            repository set of their own.
          </comment>
        </field>
        <field xdoc.separator="blank">
          <name>profiles</name>

          <association>
            <type>Repository</type>
            <multiplicity>*</multiplicity>
          </association>
          <comment><![CDATA[ This may be removed or relocated in the near
            future. It is undecided whether plugins really need a remote
            repository set of their own. ]]></comment>
        </field>
      </fields>
    </class>
    <class>
      <name>Activation</name>