override fun createPointer(): KtSymbolPointer<KtSymbol> = withValidityAssertion {
        KtPsiBasedSymbolPointer.createForSymbolFromSource<KtClassInitializerSymbol>(this)?.let { return it }
        TODO("Figure out how to create such a pointer. Should we give an index to class initializers?")
    }

    override val symbolKind: KtSymbolKind get() = withValidityAssertion { KtSymbolKind.CLASS_MEMBER }

   00A0; NO-BREAK SPACE
   1680; OGHAM SPACE MARK
   2000; EN QUAD
   2001; EM QUAD
   2002; EN SPACE
   2003; EM SPACE
   2004; THREE-PER-EM SPACE
   2005; FOUR-PER-EM SPACE
   2006; SIX-PER-EM SPACE
   2007; FIGURE SPACE
   2008; PUNCTUATION SPACE
   2009; THIN SPACE
   200A; HAIR SPACE
   200B; ZERO WIDTH SPACE
   202F; NARROW NO-BREAK SPACE
   205F; MEDIUM MATHEMATICAL SPACE

# Set the environment variable BUILD_WITH_CONTAINER to use a container
# to build the repo. The only dependencies in this mode are to have make and
# docker. If you'd rather build with a local tool chain instead, you'll need to
# figure out all the tools you need in your environment to make that work.
export BUILD_WITH_CONTAINER ?= 0

ifeq ($(BUILD_WITH_CONTAINER),1)

# An export free of arguments in a Makefile places all variables in the Makefile into the

**Please provide a description of this PR:**



**To help us figure out who should review this PR, please put an X in all the areas that this PR affects.**

- [ ] Ambient
- [ ] Configuration Infrastructure
- [ ] Docs
- [ ] Dual Stack
- [ ] Installation
- [ ] Networking
- [ ] Performance and Scalability
- [ ] Policies and Telemetry
- [ ] Security
- [ ] Test and Release
- [ ] User Experience
- [ ] Developer Infrastructure

 plugin parameters and anything else.

 We once had a document that Vincent and I agreed upon and I was about to
 implement it and then I disappeared for 8 months so it never came to pass.

 So I guess it's important to figure out what people are using properties
 files for and see if we can't incorporate it all into the POM. Or if we do
 have properties file (something I would like to avoid) say they don't

# History, Design and Future

Some time ago, <a href="https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/issues/3#issuecomment-454956920" class="external-link" target="_blank">a **FastAPI** user asked</a>:

> What’s the history of this project? It seems to have come from nowhere to awesome in a few weeks [...]

Here's a little bit of that history.

## Alternatives

Nils Lindemann <******@****.***> 1711822248 +0100

Alejandra <******@****.***> 1711071731 -0500

   *     remote server accepted the request before the failure.
   * @throws IllegalStateException when the call has already been executed.
   */
  @Throws(IOException::class)
  fun execute(): Response

  /**
   * Schedules the request to be executed at some point in the future.
   *
   * The [dispatcher][OkHttpClient.dispatcher] defines when the request will run: usually

Alejandra <******@****.***> 1711071731 -0500