*
     * @param firQualifiedAccess FIR for the shortening target expression
     * @param calledSymbol The symbol referenced by the qualified access expression
     * @param expressionInScope An expression under the same scope as the shortening target expression
     *
     * The decision has two steps:
     *  1. Collect all candidates matching [firQualifiedAccess]

     * For `=` and compound access like `+=`, `-=`, `*=`, `/=`, `%=`, the LHS of the binary expression is not a complete call. Hence we
     * find the containing binary expression and resolve that instead.
     *
     * However, if, say, `+=` resolves to `plusAssign`, then the LHS is self-contained. In this case we do not return the containing binary
     * expression so that the FIR element corresponding to the LHS is used directly.
     */

		Description:    "Did not find the expected identifier for AT name in the SQL expression.",
		HTTPStatusCode: http.StatusBadRequest,
	},
	ErrParseAsteriskIsNotAloneInSelectList: {
		Code:           "ParseAsteriskIsNotAloneInSelectList",
		Description:    "Other expressions are not allowed in the SELECT list when '*' is used without dot notation in the SQL expression.",
		HTTPStatusCode: http.StatusBadRequest,
	},

    public static final List<String> VALID_MODEL_VERSIONS =
            Collections.unmodifiableList(Arrays.asList("4.0.0", "4.1.0"));

    private static final Pattern EXPRESSION_NAME_PATTERN = Pattern.compile("\\$\\{(.+?)}");
    private static final Pattern EXPRESSION_PROJECT_NAME_PATTERN = Pattern.compile("\\$\\{(project.+?)}");

    private static final String ILLEGAL_FS_CHARS = "\\/:\"<>|?*";

		t.Fatalf("Build Order condition, but got %v", result.Statement.SQL.String())
	}

	stmt := dryDB.Clauses(clause.OrderBy{
		Expression: clause.Expr{SQL: "FIELD(id,?)", Vars: []interface{}{[]int{1, 2, 3}}, WithoutParentheses: true},
	}).Find(&User{}).Statement

	explainedSQL := dryDB.Dialector.Explain(stmt.SQL.String(), stmt.Vars...)