}

    // If caller specified all edges, check that we have seen all
    if (is_exact_edges) {
      ASSERT_EQ(e_edges.size() + c_edges.size(), a_edges.size())
          << "Expected edges: " << ToString(e_edges)
          << " Expected Control edges: " << ToString(c_edges)
          << " Actual edges: " << ToString(a_edges)
          << " in fdef: " << fdef.DebugString();
    }
  }

//   must be either listed in `inputs` or must come from another node in
//   the body. In particular, it is an error to have a control edge going from
//   a node outside of the body into a node in the body. This applies to control
//   edges going from nodes referenced in `inputs` to nodes in the body when
//   the former nodes are not in the body (automatically skipped or not

  ASSERT_EQ(1, TF_OperationNumInputs(neg));
  TF_Output neg_input = TF_OperationInput({neg, 0});
  EXPECT_EQ(scalar, neg_input.oper);
  EXPECT_EQ(0, neg_input.index);

  // Test that we can't see control edges involving the source and sink nodes.
  TF_Operation* control_ops[100];
  EXPECT_EQ(0, TF_OperationNumControlInputs(scalar));
  EXPECT_EQ(0, TF_OperationGetControlInputs(scalar, control_ops, 100));

  //    visible to done(). This is because there is no happens before edge between the write and a
  //    (hypothetical) unsafe read by our caller. Note: adding 'volatile' does not fix this issue,
  //    it would just add an edge such that if done() observed non-null, then it would also
  //    definitely observe all earlier writes, but we still have no guarantee that done() would see

   */
  @JvmName("uri")
  fun toUri(): URI {
    val uri = newBuilder().reencodeForUri().toString()
    return try {
      URI(uri)
    } catch (e: URISyntaxException) {
      // Unlikely edge case: the URI has a forbidden character in the fragment. Strip it & retry.
      try {
        val stripped = uri.replace(Regex("[\\u0000-\\u001F\\u007F-\\u009F\\p{javaWhitespace}]"), "")
        URI.create(stripped)