But as you go away from the counter and sit at the table with a number for your turn, you can switch 🔀 your attention to your crush, and "work" ⏯ 🤓 on that. Then you are again doing something very "productive" as is flirting with your crush 😍.

This has been mostly done, but there remain a few holdouts (fixing these is out of scope).

To keep the Groovy DSL ergonomic, we generate methods as necessary from the non-Groovy equivalents.

Doing this provides the following specific benefits:
- **Reduce the API surface** - We no longer need to maintain two methods.
- **Consistency** - All languages have consistent access to the same APIs and ergonomics in the DSL.

#### Optimizations

A naive implementation would simply regenerate all resources, of all subscribed types, for each client, on any configuration change. However, this scales poorly. As a result, we have many levels of optimizations to avoid doing this work.

}

// newHTTPListener - creates new httpListener object which is interface compatible to net.Listener.
// httpListener is capable to
// * listen to multiple addresses
// * controls incoming connections only doing HTTP protocol
func newHTTPListener(ctx context.Context, serverAddrs []string, opts TCPOptions) (listener *httpListener, listenErrs []error) {
	listeners := make([]net.Listener, 0, len(serverAddrs))

- Each pool expects each host in this pool has the same number of drives specified as any other host.
- Mixing `local-path` and `distributed-path` is not allowed, doing so would cause MinIO to refuse starting the server.
- Ellipses notation (e.g. `{1...10}`) or bracket notations are fully allowed (e.g. `{a,c,f}`) to have multiple entries in one line.

                               "' has a reference type ", DataTypeString(dt))
             : absl::OkStatus();
}

// Converts `ninputs` and `inputs` into `inputs_tensors` and `input_nodes` and
// does various checks while doing so. `input_nodes` will contain the same
// information as input_tensors just in a different structure to make
// following processing easier. TODO(iga): Simplify this nested structure.
Status ProcessInputs(

    List<E> expected = Helpers.copyToList(getSampleElements());
    expected.addAll(index, elements);
    expectContents(expected);
  }

  /*
   * TODO: if we're testing a list, we could check indexOf(). (Doing it in
   * AbstractListTester isn't enough because many tests that run on lists don't
   * extends AbstractListTester.) We could also iterate over all elements to
   * verify absence
   */

Flask is a "microframework", it doesn't include database integrations nor many of the things that come by default in Django.

This simplicity and flexibility allow doing things like using NoSQL databases as the main data storage system.

As it is very simple, it's relatively intuitive to learn, although the documentation gets somewhat technical at some points.

The only thing the function returned by `GzipRequest.get_route_handler` does differently is convert the `Request` to a `GzipRequest`.

Doing this, our `GzipRequest` will take care of decompressing the data (if necessary) before passing it to our *path operations*.

After that, all of the processing logic is the same.

      if (networkResponse == null && cacheCandidate != null) {
        cacheCandidate.body.closeQuietly()
      }
    }

    // If we have a cache response too, then we're doing a conditional get.
    if (cacheResponse != null) {
      if (networkResponse?.code == HTTP_NOT_MODIFIED) {
        val response =
          cacheResponse.newBuilder()