}

    // TODO let the scope handler deal with this
    private static boolean isCompilePathElement(final String scope) {
        return Artifact.SCOPE_COMPILE.equals(scope)
                || Artifact.SCOPE_PROVIDED.equals(scope)
                || Artifact.SCOPE_SYSTEM.equals(scope);
    }

    // TODO let the scope handler deal with this

            if (inputStream != null) {
                return xml.read(inputStream, request.isStrict(), source);
            } else if (reader != null) {
                return xml.read(reader, request.isStrict(), source);
            } else if (path != null) {
                try (InputStream is = Files.newInputStream(path)) {
                    return xml.read(is, request.isStrict(), source);
                }
            } else {

            if (inputStream != null) {
                return xml.read(inputStream, request.isStrict(), source);
            } else if (reader != null) {
                return xml.read(reader, request.isStrict(), source);
            } else if (path != null) {
                try (InputStream is = Files.newInputStream(path)) {
                    return xml.read(is, request.isStrict(), source);
                }
            } else {

            if (reader != null) {
                return xml.read(reader, request.isStrict());
            } else {
                return xml.read(inputStream, request.isStrict());
            }
        } catch (Exception e) {
            throw new XmlReaderException("Unable to read toolchains", e);
        }
    }

    @Override

            if (reader != null) {
                return xml.read(reader, request.isStrict());
            } else {
                return xml.read(inputStream, request.isStrict());
            }
        } catch (Exception e) {
            throw new XmlReaderException("Unable to read toolchains: " + getMessage(e), getLocation(e), e);
        }
    }

    @Override

        Path tempFile = Files.createTempFile("", ".pom");
        Files.delete(tempFile);
        try (InputStream expected = Files.newInputStream(beforePomFile)) {
            Model model = new Model(new MavenStaxReader().read(expected));
            MavenProject project = new MavenProject(model);
            project.setOriginalModel(model);
            DefaultConsumerPomArtifactTransformer t = new DefaultConsumerPomArtifactTransformer((s, p, f) -> {

                    return PersistedToolchains.newInstance();
                }
                toolchains = request.getSession()
                        .getService(ToolchainsXmlFactory.class)
                        .read(XmlReaderRequest.builder()
                                .inputStream(is)
                                .location(toolchainsSource.getLocation())
                                .strict(true)

            plugin.setGroupId(tok[0]);
            plugin.setArtifactId(tok[1]);
            plugin.setVersion(tok[2]);
            goal = tok[3];

            // This won't be valid, but it constructs something easy to read in the error message
            for (int idx = 4; idx < tok.length; idx++) {
                goal += ":" + tok[idx];
            }
        } else if (numTokens == 3) {

            // even before the arguments from the command line are parsed.  Any exception
            // that would happen here should cause the build to fail at a later stage
            // (when actually parsing the POM) and will lead to a better exception being
            // displayed to the user, so just bail out and return false.
        }
        return false;
    }

         * unique within a single POM. Upon multiple declarations, 2.x just kept the last one but retained the order of
         * the first occurrence. So when we're in lenient/compat mode, we have to deal with such broken POMs and mimic
         * the way 2.x works. When we're in strict mode, the removal of duplicates just saves other merging steps from
         * aftereffects and bogus error messages.
         */