*       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

   *
   * @throws NumberFormatException if the string does not contain a valid unsigned {@code int} value
   * @throws NullPointerException if {@code s} is null (in contrast to {@link
   *     Integer#parseInt(String)})
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public static int parseUnsignedInt(String s) {
    return parseUnsignedInt(s, 10);
  }

  /**

   *
   * @throws NumberFormatException if the string does not contain a valid unsigned {@code byte}
   *     value
   * @throws NullPointerException if {@code string} is null (in contrast to {@link
   *     Byte#parseByte(String)})
   * @since 13.0
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public static byte parseUnsignedByte(String string) {
    return parseUnsignedByte(string, 10);
  }

  /**

import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;

/**
 * A mapping from disjoint nonempty ranges to non-null values. Queries look up the value associated
 * with the range (if any) that contains a specified key.
 *
 * <p>In contrast to {@link RangeSet}, no "coalescing" is done of {@linkplain
 * Range#isConnected(Range) connected} ranges, even if they are mapped to the same value.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 * @since 14.0
 */

        return 0;
      }
    }

    /**
     * Removes exactly the specified number of occurrences of {@code element}, or makes no change if
     * this is not possible.
     *
     * <p>This method, in contrast to {@link #remove(Object, int)}, has no effect when the element
     * count is smaller than {@code occurrences}.
     *
     * @param element the element to remove

  protected void tearDown() {
    tearDownStack.runTearDown();
  }

  /**
   * This first test doesn't test anything in Uninterruptibles, just demonstrates some normal
   * behavior of futures so that you can contrast the next test with it.
   */
  public void testRegularFutureInterrupted() throws ExecutionException {

    /*
     * Here's the order of events that we want.
     *

    //
    // Note: According to the spec, a NumberFormatException is thrown for a number that is not
    // parseable, but the spec doesn't seem to say which exception is thrown for an invalid radix.
    // In contrast to the JVM, Kotlin native throws an Illegal argument exception in this case
    // (which seems to make more sense).
    try {
      UnsignedInts.parseUnsignedInt("0", Character.MIN_RADIX - 1);
      fail();

 * all threads. Note, however, that it does not guarantee fairness.
 *
 * <p>Rate limiters are often used to restrict the rate at which some physical or logical resource
 * is accessed. This is in contrast to {@link java.util.concurrent.Semaphore} which restricts the
 * number of concurrent accesses instead of the rate (note though that concurrency and rate are