import java.util.concurrent.Future;
import java.util.concurrent.ScheduledFuture;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Tests for TestingExecutors.
 *
 * @author Eric Chang
 */
public class TestingExecutorsTest extends TestCase {
  private volatile boolean taskDone;

  public void testNoOpScheduledExecutor() throws InterruptedException {
    taskDone = false;
    Runnable task =

import java.util.concurrent.Future;
import java.util.concurrent.ScheduledFuture;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Tests for TestingExecutors.
 *
 * @author Eric Chang
 */
public class TestingExecutorsTest extends TestCase {
  private volatile boolean taskDone;

  public void testNoOpScheduledExecutor() throws InterruptedException {
    taskDone = false;
    Runnable task =

     file).
  3. Files should be formatted according to Google's [Java style guide][].
  4. Please squash all commits for a change into a single commit (this can be
     done using `git rebase -i`). Do your best to have a
     [well-formed commit message][] for the change.

[Java style guide]: https://google.github.io/styleguide/javaguide.html

  /**
   * Verifies that a collection is immutable.
   *
   * <p>A collection is considered immutable if:
   *
   * <ol>
   *   <li>All its mutation methods result in UnsupportedOperationException, and do not change the
   *       underlying contents.
   *   <li>All methods that return objects that can indirectly mutate the collection throw
   *       UnsupportedOperationException when those mutators are called.
   * </ol>
   *

      Collection<Integer> indexes, int scale, double[] dataset);

  static double getMinValue(double[] array, int from) {
    // This is basically a copy of com.google.math.Rank#getMinValue, with a small change in the
    // method signature: we always search to the end of the array.
    int min = from;
    for (int i = from + 1; i < array.length; i++) {
      if (array[min] > array[i]) {
        min = i;
      }

      Collection<Integer> indexes, int scale, double[] dataset);

  static double getMinValue(double[] array, int from) {
    // This is basically a copy of com.google.math.Rank#getMinValue, with a small change in the
    // method signature: we always search to the end of the array.
    int min = from;
    for (int i = from + 1; i < array.length; i++) {
      if (array[min] > array[i]) {
        min = i;
      }

 * bad design, and it does not prevent anyone from using the declaration---and experience has shown
 * that they will. If the method breaks the encapsulation of its class, then its internal
 * representation will be hard to change. Instead, use <a
 * href="http://errorprone.info/bugpattern/RestrictedApi">RestrictedApiChecker</a>, which enforces
 * fine-grained visibility policies.
 *
 * @author Johannes Henkel
 */
@GwtCompatible

   * class to begin with but rather something returned from a static factory method whose declared
   * return type is plain FilenameFilter. If we made such a change, then the annotation we choose
   * here would have no significance to end users, who would be forced to conform to the signature
   * used in FilenameFilter.)
   */
  @Override

 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> The methods of {@code ForwardingDeque} forward <b>indiscriminately</b> to the
 * methods of the delegate. For example, overriding {@link #add} alone <b>will not</b> change the
 * behavior of {@link #offer} which can lead to unexpected behavior. In this case, you should
 * override {@code offer} as well.
 *

 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> The methods of {@code ForwardingQueue} forward <b>indiscriminately</b> to the
 * methods of the delegate. For example, overriding {@link #add} alone <b>will not</b> change the
 * behavior of {@link #offer} which can lead to unexpected behavior. In this case, you should
 * override {@code offer} as well, either providing your own implementation, or delegating to the