ORW	-1(R1), R2            // e3201fffff56
	XOR	(R1), R2              // e32010000082
	XORW	(R1), R2              // 57201000
	XORW	-1(R1), R2            // e3201fffff57

	// shift and rotate instructions
	SRD	$4, R4, R7              // eb740004000c
	SRD	R1, R4, R7              // eb741000000c
	SRW	$4, R4, R7              // eb74000400de
	SRW	R1, R4, R7              // eb74100000de

TypeName form of the LiteralType appears as an operand between the
<a href="#Keywords">keyword</a> and the opening brace of the block
of an "if", "for", or "switch" statement, and the composite literal
is not enclosed in parentheses, square brackets, or curly braces.
In this rare case, the opening brace of the literal is erroneously parsed
as the one introducing the block of statements. To resolve the ambiguity,

<code>R0@&gt;16</code>:
For <code>&lt;&lt;</code>, left shift <code>R0</code> by 16 bits.
The other codes are <code>-&gt;</code> (arithmetic right shift),
<code>&gt;&gt;</code> (logical right shift), and
<code>@&gt;</code> (rotate right).
</li>

<li>
<code>R0-&gt;R1</code>
<br>
<code>R0&gt;&gt;R1</code>
<br>
<code>R0&lt;&lt;R1</code>
<br>
<code>R0@&gt;R1</code>:

		return 0
	}
	var op int16
	switch p.next().ScanToken {
	case lex.LSH:
		op = 0
	case lex.RSH:
		op = 1
	case lex.ARR:
		op = 2
	case lex.ROT:
		// following instructions on ARM64 support rotate right
		// AND, ANDS, TST, BIC, BICS, EON, EOR, ORR, MVN, ORN
		op = 3
	}
	tok := p.next()
	str := tok.String()
	var count int16
	switch tok.ScanToken {
	case scanner.Ident:

	case n == 1:
		return IndexByte(s, sep[0])
	case n == len(s):
		if Equal(sep, s) {
			return 0
		}
		return -1
	case n > len(s):
		return -1
	case n <= bytealg.MaxLen:
		// Use brute force when s and sep both are small
		if len(s) <= bytealg.MaxBruteForce {
			return bytealg.Index(s, sep)
		}
		c0 := sep[0]
		c1 := sep[1]
		i := 0
		t := len(s) - n + 1
		fails := 0

TypeName form of the LiteralType appears as an operand between the
<a href="#Keywords">keyword</a> and the opening brace of the block
of an "if", "for", or "switch" statement, and the composite literal
is not enclosed in parentheses, square brackets, or curly braces.
In this rare case, the opening brace of the literal is erroneously parsed
as the one introducing the block of statements. To resolve the ambiguity,