* Then check that the tests **pass** after the PR. ✅

* Many PRs don't have tests, you can **remind** them to add tests, or you can even **suggest** some tests yourself. That's one of the things that consume most time and you can help a lot with that.

* Then also comment what you tried, that way I'll know that you checked it. 🤓

## Create a Pull Request

This decoupling of parts, and being a "microframework" that could be extended to cover exactly what is needed was a key feature that I wanted to keep.

Given the simplicity of Flask, it seemed like a good match for building APIs. The next thing to find was a "Django REST Framework" for Flask.

!!! check "Inspired **FastAPI** to"

  HttpUrl baseUrl = server.url("/v1/chat/");

  // Exercise your application code, which should make those HTTP requests.
  // Responses are returned in the same order that they are enqueued.
  Chat chat = new Chat(baseUrl);

  chat.loadMore();
  assertEquals("hello, world!", chat.messages());

  chat.loadMore();
  chat.loadMore();
  assertEquals(""
      + "hello, world!\n"
      + "sup, bra?\n"

  - type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: 1. What are you trying to do?
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: 2. What's the best code you can write to accomplish that without the new feature?
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: 3. What would that same code look like if we added your feature?
    validations:

      description: Tell us what happens
    validations:
      required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: expected-behavior
    attributes:
      label: Expected Behavior
      description: Tell us what should happen
    validations:
      required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: context
    attributes:
      label: Context (optional)
      description: |
        How has this issue affected you? What are you trying to accomplish?

    ```

The last `CommonQueryParams`, in:

```Python
... Depends(CommonQueryParams)
```

...is what **FastAPI** will actually use to know what is the dependency.

From it is that FastAPI will extract the declared parameters and that is what FastAPI will actually call.

---

In this case, the first `CommonQueryParams`, in:

=== "Python 3.8+"

    ```Python

 maven 1.x and 2.x is that all project parameterization occurs in the POM and not from properties
 files.

 For many of the more advanced features in Maven2 it is critical that POMs be available in the local repository.
 Features like transitive dependencies and the new parent specification mechanism. The problem we run into is

```

The `@app.get("/")` tells **FastAPI** that the function right below is in charge of handling requests that go to:

* the path `/`
* using a <abbr title="an HTTP GET method"><code>get</code> operation</abbr>

!!! info "`@decorator` Info"
    That `@something` syntax in Python is called a "decorator".

    You put it on top of a function. Like a pretty decorative hat (I guess that's where the term came from).

You could create an API with a *path operation* that could trigger a request to an *external API* created by someone else (probably the same developer that would be *using* your API).

The process that happens when your API app calls the *external API* is named a "callback". Because the software that the external developer wrote sends a request to your API and then your API *calls back*, sending a request to an *external API* (that was probably created by the same developer).

For any non-trivial change, we need to be able to answer these questions:

* Why is this change done? What's the use case?
* For user facing features, what will the API look like?
* What test cases should it have? What could go wrong?
* How will it roughly be implemented? We'll happily provide code pointers to save you time.