repeated Ingress items = 2;
}

// IngressLoadBalancerIngress represents the status of a load-balancer ingress point.
message IngressLoadBalancerIngress {
  // ip is set for load-balancer ingress points that are IP based.
  // +optional
  optional string ip = 1;

  // hostname is set for load-balancer ingress points that are DNS based.
  // +optional
  optional string hostname = 2;

  repeated Ingress items = 2;
}

// IngressLoadBalancerIngress represents the status of a load-balancer ingress point.
message IngressLoadBalancerIngress {
  // ip is set for load-balancer ingress points that are IP based.
  // +optional
  optional string ip = 1;

  // hostname is set for load-balancer ingress points that are DNS based.
  // +optional
  optional string hostname = 2;

Concurrency is different than parallelism. And it is better on **specific** scenarios that involve a lot of waiting. Because of that, it generally is a lot better than parallelism for web application development. But not for everything.

So, to balance that out, imagine the following short story:

> You have to clean a big, dirty house.

*Yep, that's the whole story*.

---

  repeated Ingress items = 2;
}

// IngressLoadBalancerIngress represents the status of a load-balancer ingress point.
message IngressLoadBalancerIngress {
  // IP is set for load-balancer ingress points that are IP based.
  // +optional
  optional string ip = 1;

  // Hostname is set for load-balancer ingress points that are DNS based.
  // +optional
  optional string hostname = 2;

	StartTime time.Time   `msg:"startTs"` // Time at which rebalance-start was issued
	EndTime   time.Time   `msg:"stopTs"`  // Time at which rebalance operation completed or rebalance-stop was called
	Status    rebalStatus `msg:"status"`  // Current state of rebalance operation. One of Started|Stopped|Completed|Failed.
}

// rebalanceMeta contains information pertaining to an ongoing rebalance operation.
type rebalanceMeta struct {

And when working with containers, the same system you use to start and manage them would already have internal tools to transmit the **network communication** (e.g. HTTP requests) from that **load balancer** (that could also be a **TLS Termination Proxy**) to the container(s) with your app.

### One Load Balancer - Multiple Worker Containers

		return
	}

	// Rebalance routine is run on the first node of any pool participating in rebalance.
	pools.StartRebalance()

	b, err := json.Marshal(struct {
		ID string `json:"id"`
	}{ID: id})
	if err != nil {
		writeErrorResponseJSON(ctx, w, toAPIError(ctx, err), r.URL)
		return
	}

	writeSuccessResponseJSON(w, b)

                              type: object
                          type: object
                        loadBalancer:
                          description: Settings controlling the load balancer algorithms.
                          oneOf:
                          - not:
                              anyOf:
                              - required:
                                - simple

### Ein Load Balancer – mehrere Workercontainer

```console
 helm install -n istio-system istiod manifests/charts/istio-control/istio-discovery --set profile=openshift
```

4) `gateways` charts install a load balancer with `ingress` and `egress`.

Ingress secrets and access should be separated from the control plane.

```console
helm install -n istio-system istio-ingress manifests/charts/gateways/istio-ingress --set profile=openshift