SEQUENTIAL {
      @Override
      final <T extends @Nullable Object, A extends @Nullable Object, R extends @Nullable Object>
          A result(Collector<T, A, R> collector, Iterable<T> inputs) {
        A accum = collector.supplier().get();
        for (T input : inputs) {
          collector.accumulator().accept(accum, input);
        }
        return accum;
      }
    },

   * identical inputs: This sounds like it ought to be a problem here, since the goals of this class
   * include testing that {@code equals()} is reflexive and is tolerant of {@code null}. However,
   * there's no problem. The reason: {@link EqualsTester} tests {@code null} and identical inputs
   * directly against {@code equals()} rather than through the {@code Equivalence}.
   */

    /*
     * TODO: cpovirk - Pre-size the HashMap based on the number of enum values? (But *not* based on
     * the number of entries in the map, as that makes it easy for hostile inputs to trigger lots of
     * allocation—not that any program should be deserializing hostile inputs to begin with!)
     */
    setDelegates(new EnumMap<K, V>(keyTypeOrObjectUnderJ2cl), new HashMap<V, K>());
    Serialization.populateMap(this, stream);
  }

     *
     * Unfortunately, we don't distinguish between these two cases in our public API: Joiner.on(...)
     * and Joiner.on(...).useForNull(...) both declare the same return type: plain Joiner. To ensure
     * that users *can* pass null arguments to Joiner, we annotate it as if it always tolerates null
     * inputs, rather than as if it never tolerates them.
     *

import sun.security.jca.Providers;

/**
 * Tests for the MacHashFunction.
 *
 * @author Kurt Alfred Kluever
 */
public class MacHashFunctionTest extends TestCase {

  private static final ImmutableSet<String> INPUTS = ImmutableSet.of("", "Z", "foobar");

  private static final SecretKey MD5_KEY =
      new SecretKeySpec("secret key".getBytes(UTF_8), "HmacMD5");
  private static final SecretKey SHA1_KEY =

   */
  @SafeVarargs
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object> Iterable<T> concat(Iterable<? extends T>... inputs) {
    return FluentIterable.concat(inputs);
  }

  /**
   * Combines multiple iterables into a single iterable. The returned iterable has an iterator that
   * traverses the elements of each iterable in {@code inputs}. The input iterators are not polled
   * until necessary.
   *

import java.util.Random;
import junit.framework.TestSuite;

/**
 * A generator of {@code TestSuite} instances for testing {@code ByteSource} implementations.
 * Generates tests of all methods on a {@code ByteSource} given various inputs the source is
 * expected to contain as well as sub-suites for testing the {@code CharSource} view and {@code
 * slice()} views in the same way.
 *
 * @author Colin Decker
 */

  }

  /**
   * Returns a {@code Collector} that accumulates elements into an {@code ImmutableMultiset} whose
   * elements are the result of applying {@code elementFunction} to the inputs, with counts equal to
   * the result of applying {@code countFunction} to the inputs.
   *
   * <p>If the mapped elements contain duplicates (according to {@link Object#equals}), the first

   * with the UTF-8 character encoding. The caller is responsible for <a
   * href="https://goo.gl/9EfkM1">replacing any unpaired carriage return or line feed characters
   * with a CR+LF pair</a> on any non-file inputs before escaping them with this escaper.
   *
   * <p>When escaping a String, the following rules apply:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>The alphanumeric characters "a" through "z", "A" through "Z" and "0" through "9" remain

    checkTryParse(Float.POSITIVE_INFINITY, "Infinity");
    checkTryParse(Float.POSITIVE_INFINITY, "+Infinity");
    checkTryParse(Float.NEGATIVE_INFINITY, "-Infinity");
  }

  private static final String[] BAD_TRY_PARSE_INPUTS = {
    "",
    "+-",
    "+-0",
    " 5",
    "32 ",
    " 55 ",
    "infinity",
    "POSITIVE_INFINITY",
    "0x9A",
    "0x9A.bE-5",
    ".",
    ".e5",
    "NaNd",