---
  Getting to Plexus-configured Mojos
  ---
  John Casey
  ---
  2005-04-29

Abstract

  We're moving toward integrating mojos as first-class plexus components, while
  at the same time avoiding introducing required plexus dependencies into the
  mojo development model.

  In order to really achieve this, we need mojo configurations (which are
  provided both in terms of static expressions that are just looked up, and

 that currently we have information about a project scattered across the project.xml and the
 various properties files. What needs to be done is to encapsulate all of this in the POM.

 Typically users parameterize the use of plugins, or have custom values like ${user.name}
 for use in elements like the <developerConnection/>. It would be idea if we

```

## Create Pydantic models

As **Couchbase** "documents" are actually just "JSON objects", we can model them with Pydantic.

### `User` model

First, let's create a `User` model:

```Python hl_lines="24-28"
{!../../../docs_src/nosql_databases/tutorial001.py!}
```

We will use this model in our *path operation function*, so, we don't include in it the `hashed_password`.

### `UserInDB` model

We can use **OAuth2** to build that with **FastAPI**.

But let's save you the time of reading the full long specification just to find those little pieces of information you need.

Let's use the tools provided by **FastAPI** to handle security.

## How it looks

Let's first just use the code and see how it works, and then we'll come back to understand what's happening.

We can also use this same approach to access the request body in an exception handler.

All we need to do is handle the request inside a `try`/`except` block:

```Python hl_lines="13  15"
{!../../../docs_src/custom_request_and_route/tutorial002.py!}
```

If an exception occurs, the`Request` instance will still be in scope, so we can read and make use of the request body when handling the error:

However, for the vast majority of issues, we aim to empower individuals to first resolve conflicts themselves, asking for help when needed, and only after that fails to escalate further. This approach gives people more control over the outcome of their dispute. 

If you are experiencing or witnessing conflict, we ask you to use the following escalation strategy to address the conflict:

    "completed": False,
}
```

but it doesn't have the `id` field.

So we create a new `dict`, that contains the key-value pairs from `note.dict()` with:

```Python
{**note.dict()}
```

`**note.dict()` "unpacks" the key value pairs directly, so, `{**note.dict()}` would be, more or less, a copy of `note.dict()`.

And then, we extend that copy `dict`, adding another key-value pair: `"id": last_record_id`:

```Python

    // Less than 16,834 bytes, because we binary search on a 14-bit index.
    assertThat(compactTable.sections.length).isLessThan(1 shl 14)

    // Less than 65,536 bytes, because we binary search on a 14-bit index with a stride of 4 bytes.
    assertThat(compactTable.ranges.length).isLessThan((1 shl 14) * 4)

    // Less than 16,384 chars, because we index on a 14-bit index in the ranges table.

# Ignore arch dependent warnings, we chose the right libs on start
fess binary: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
# Not stripping external libraries
fess binary: unstripped-binary-or-object
# Ignore arch dependent warnings, we chose the right libs on start
fess binary: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share
# Please check our changelog at https://github.com/codelibs/fess

    implementation(project(":analysis:analysis-api"))

    implementation(commonDependency("org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-reflect")) { isTransitive = false }

    /*
     We do not need guava in the generator, but because of a bug in the IJ project importing, we need to have a dependency on intellijCore
     the same as it is in `:fir:tree:tree-generator` module to the project be imported correctly
     */
    compileOnly(intellijCore())