* #iterator()} method after the first, and whose iterator is always unmodifiable.
 *
 * <p>The {@code Iterable} specification does not make it absolutely clear what should happen on a
 * second invocation, so implementors have made various choices, including:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>returning the same iterator again
 *   <li>throwing an exception of some kind

 *       other tests. We want to exclude the other tests (which Android can't handle) while
 *       continuing to run {@code FooTest} itself. This is exactly what happens with {@code
 *       AndroidIncompatible}. But I'm not sure what would happen if we annotated the {@code
 *       suite()} method with {@code Suppress}. Would {@code FooTest} itself be suppressed, too?

  }

  /**
   * Returns the {@link Method} instance for {@link #testAddAll_unsupportedNonePresent()} so that
   * tests can suppress it with {@code FeatureSpecificTestSuiteBuilder.suppressing()} while we
   * figure out what to do with <a href="http://goo.gl/qJBruX">{@code ConcurrentHashMap} support for
   * {@code entrySet().add()}</a>.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection

   * {@inheritDoc}
   *
   * <p>The {@code AbstractListTester} implementation overrides {@link
   * AbstractCollectionTester#expectContents(Collection)} to verify that the order of the elements
   * in the list under test matches what is expected.
   */
  @Override
  protected void expectContents(Collection<E> expectedCollection) {
    List<E> expectedList = Helpers.copyToList(expectedCollection);

 *   for (ThingToRun thingToRun : thingsToRun) {
 *     thingToRun.run(); // say this may throw an exception, but you want to
 *                       // always run all thingsToRun
 *   }
 * }
 * </pre>
 *
 * <p>This is what the code would become:
 *
 * <pre>
 * void runManyThings({@literal List<ThingToRun>} thingsToRun) {
 *   {@literal List<Exception>} exceptions = Lists.newArrayList();
 *   for (ThingToRun thingToRun : thingsToRun) {

import com.google.common.cache.TestingRemovalListeners.CountingRemovalListener;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Set;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Tests relating to cache eviction: what does and doesn't count toward maximumSize, what happens
 * when maximumSize is reached, etc.
 *
 * @author mike nonemacher
 */
public class CacheEvictionTest extends TestCase {
  static final int MAX_SIZE = 100;

    String data = "Hi There";

    checkSha1("b617318655057264e28bc0b6fb378c8ef146be00", key, data);
  }

  public void testRfc2202_hmacSha1_case2() {
    byte[] key = "Jefe".getBytes(UTF_8);
    String data = "what do ya want for nothing?";

    checkSha1("effcdf6ae5eb2fa2d27416d5f184df9c259a7c79", key, data);
  }

  public void testRfc2202_hmacSha1_case3() {
    byte[] key = fillByteArray(20, 0xaa);

  int joinerWithCharacterDelimiter(int reps) {
    int dummy = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < reps; i++) {
      dummy ^= JOINER_ON_CHARACTER.join(components).length();
    }
    return dummy;
  }

  /**
   * Mimics what the {@link Joiner} class does internally when no extra options like ignoring {@code
   * null} values are used.
   */
  @Benchmark
  int joinerInlined(int reps) {
    int dummy = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < reps; i++) {

    assertEvents(
        "R0.00, R1.38, R1.13, R0.88, R0.63, R0.50, R0.50, R0.50", // #1
        "U4.50", // #2
        "R0.00, R1.38, R1.13", // #3, after that the rate changes
        "R0.88", // #4, this is what the throttling would be with the old rate
        "R0.34, R0.28, R0.25, R0.25", // #5
        "U4.25", // #6
        "R0.00, R0.72, R0.66, R0.59, R0.53, R0.47, R0.41", // #7

 *       other tests. We want to exclude the other tests (which Android can't handle) while
 *       continuing to run {@code FooTest} itself. This is exactly what happens with {@code
 *       AndroidIncompatible}. But I'm not sure what would happen if we annotated the {@code
 *       suite()} method with {@code Suppress}. Would {@code FooTest} itself be suppressed, too?