"Should be able to peek() first element multiple times", "A", peekingIterator.peek());
    assertEquals(
        "next() should still return first element after peeking", "A", peekingIterator.next());

    assertEquals("Should be able to peek() at middle element", "B", peekingIterator.peek());
    assertEquals(
        "Should be able to peek() middle element multiple times", "B", peekingIterator.peek());
    assertEquals(

The [Repeat] function returns a new slice that repeats the

        "Should be able to peek() first element multiple times", "A", peekingIterator.peek());
    assertEquals(
        "next() should still return first element after peeking", "A", peekingIterator.next());

    assertEquals("Should be able to peek() at middle element", "B", peekingIterator.peek());
    assertEquals(
        "Should be able to peek() middle element multiple times", "B", peekingIterator.peek());
    assertEquals(

Aqui está um pouco dessa história.

## Alternativas

Eu tenho criado APIs com requisitos complexos por vários anos (Aprendizado de Máquina, sistemas distribuídos, tarefas assíncronas, banco de dados NoSQL etc.), liderando vários times de desenvolvedores.

Como parte disso, eu precisava investigar, testar e usar muitas alternativas.

A história do **FastAPI** é, em grande parte, a história de seus predecessores.

  private static class Prepender {

    private final String prefix;
    private final int times;

    Prepender(@NotBlank @Nullable String prefix, int times) throws NullPointerException {
      this.prefix = prefix;
      this.times = times;
    }

    Prepender(String... varargs) {
      this(null, 0);
    }

    // just for testing

/**
 * A unit of work that can be executed one or more times.
 *
 * Recurrence
 * ----------
 *
 * Tasks control their recurrence schedule. The [runOnce] function returns -1L to signify that the
 * task should not be executed again. Otherwise it returns a delay until the next execution.
 *
 * A task has at most one next execution. If the same task instance is scheduled multiple times, the

        Guava's main yardstick for evaluating proposed features can be summed up as [utility times
        ubiquity](https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/PhilosophyExplained#utility-times-ubiquity).


        #### Utility: compare with alternatives


        There is always *some* alternative to adding a new feature to Guava, even if it's just

  private static class Prepender {

    private final String prefix;
    private final int times;

    Prepender(@NotBlank @Nullable String prefix, int times) throws NullPointerException {
      this.prefix = prefix;
      this.times = times;
    }

    Prepender(String... varargs) {
      this(null, 0);
    }

    // just for testing

   180E; MONGOLIAN VOWEL SEPARATOR
   200C; ZERO WIDTH NON-JOINER
   200D; ZERO WIDTH JOINER
   2028; LINE SEPARATOR
   2029; PARAGRAPH SEPARATOR
   2060; WORD JOINER
   2061; FUNCTION APPLICATION
   2062; INVISIBLE TIMES
   2063; INVISIBLE SEPARATOR
   206A-206F; [CONTROL CHARACTERS]
   FEFF; ZERO WIDTH NO-BREAK SPACE
   FFF9-FFFC; [CONTROL CHARACTERS]

		dataArray = append(dataArray, toAdd)
	}

	ignoredErrs := []error{
		errFileNotFound,
		errVolumeNotFound,
		errFileVersionNotFound,
		io.ErrUnexpectedEOF, // some times we would read without locks, ignore these errors
		io.EOF,              // some times we would read without locks, ignore these errors
		context.DeadlineExceeded,
		context.Canceled,
	}
	ignoredErrs = append(ignoredErrs, objectOpIgnoredErrs...)