import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * Abstract base class for tests that EventBus finds the correct subscribers.
 *
 * <p>The actual tests are distributed among the other classes in this package based on whether they
 * are annotated or abstract in the superclass.
 *
 * <p>This test must be outside the c.g.c.eventbus package to test correctly.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */

   * following conditions:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>You want to assign the same fraction of inputs to each bucket.
   *   <li>When you reduce the number of buckets, you can accept that the most recently added
   *       buckets will be removed first. More concretely, if you are dividing traffic among tasks,

   * create, cache and return" pattern. For further improvements, use {@link LoadingCache} and its
   * {@link LoadingCache#get(Object) get(K)} method instead of this one.
   *
   * <p>Among the improvements that this method and {@code LoadingCache.get(K)} both provide are:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>{@linkplain LoadingCache#get(Object) awaiting the result of a pending load} rather than

result seemed to follow, except a little shaking among the
distant green leaves.

  As there seemed to be no chance of getting her hands up to her
head, she tried to get her head down to them, and was delighted
to find that her neck would bend about easily in any direction,
like a serpent.  She had just succeeded in curving it down into a
graceful zigzag, and was going to dive in among the leaves, which

 * Thread2: acquire(LockB) --X acquire(LockA)
 * </pre>
 *
 * <p>Neither thread will progress because each is waiting for the other. In more complex
 * applications, cycles can arise from interactions among more than 2 locks:
 *
 * <pre>
 * Thread1: acquire(LockA) --X acquire(LockB)
 * Thread2: acquire(LockB) --X acquire(LockC)
 * ...
 * ThreadN: acquire(LockN) --X acquire(LockA)
 * </pre>
 *

    }
  },

  /** Java variable naming convention, e.g., "lowerCamel". */
  LOWER_CAMEL(CharMatcher.inRange('A', 'Z'), "") {
    @Override
    String normalizeWord(String word) {
      return firstCharOnlyToUpper(word);
    }

    @Override
    String normalizeFirstWord(String word) {
      return Ascii.toLowerCase(word);
    }
  },

  /** Java and C++ class naming convention, e.g., "UpperCamel". */

  @CheckForNull private ThreadFactory backingThreadFactory = null;

  /** Creates a new {@link ThreadFactory} builder. */
  public ThreadFactoryBuilder() {}

  /**
   * Sets the naming format to use when naming threads ({@link Thread#setName}) which are created
   * with this ThreadFactory.
   *
   * @param nameFormat a {@link String#format(String, Object...)}-compatible format String, to which

    }
  },

  /** Java variable naming convention, e.g., "lowerCamel". */
  LOWER_CAMEL(CharMatcher.inRange('A', 'Z'), "") {
    @Override
    String normalizeWord(String word) {
      return firstCharOnlyToUpper(word);
    }

    @Override
    String normalizeFirstWord(String word) {
      return Ascii.toLowerCase(word);
    }
  },

  /** Java and C++ class naming convention, e.g., "UpperCamel". */

   * create, cache and return" pattern. For further improvements, use {@link LoadingCache} and its
   * {@link LoadingCache#get(Object) get(K)} method instead of this one.
   *
   * <p>Among the improvements that this method and {@code LoadingCache.get(K)} both provide are:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>{@linkplain LoadingCache#get(Object) awaiting the result of a pending load} rather than

    // Execute the runnable immediately. Because of scheduling this may end up getting called before
    // some of the previously added runnables, but we're OK with that. If we want to change the
    // contract to guarantee ordering among runnables we'd have to modify the logic here to allow
    // it.
    executeListener(runnable, executor);
  }

  /**
   * Runs this execution list, executing all existing pairs in the order they were added. However,