...Although if the whole application is just **crashing immediately** it probably doesn't make sense to keep restarting it forever. But in those cases, you will probably notice it during development, or at least right after deployment.

    So let's focus on the main cases, where it could crash entirely in some particular cases **in the future**, and it still makes sense to restart it.

 * remove) are supported. Null keys and values are supported.
 *
 * <p>{@code containsKey(k)}, {@code put(k, v)} and {@code remove(k)} are all (expected and
 * amortized) constant time operations. Expected in the hashtable sense (depends on the hash
 * function doing a good job of distributing the elements to the buckets to a distribution not far
 * from uniform), and amortized since some operations can trigger a hash table resize.
 *

 * remove) are supported. Null keys and values are supported.
 *
 * <p>{@code containsKey(k)}, {@code put(k, v)} and {@code remove(k)} are all (expected and
 * amortized) constant time operations. Expected in the hashtable sense (depends on the hash
 * function doing a good job of distributing the elements to the buckets to a distribution not far
 * from uniform), and amortized since some operations can trigger a hash table resize.
 *

                and `response_model_exclude_defaults`. You probably want to use one of
                those two instead of this one, as those allow returning `None` values
                when it makes sense.

                Read more about it in the
                [FastAPI docs for Response Model - Return Type](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/tutorial/response-model/#response_model_exclude_none).
                """

You probably wouldn't want to take your crush 😍 with you to do errands at the bank 🏦.

### Burger Conclusion

In this scenario of "fast food burgers with your crush", as there is a lot of waiting 🕙, it makes a lot more sense to have a concurrent system ⏸🔀⏯.

This is the case for most of the web applications.

Many, many users, but your server is waiting 🕙 for their not-so-good connection to send their requests.

        classShortenStrategy: (KtClassLikeSymbol) -> ShortenStrategy,
        callableShortenStrategy: (KtCallableSymbol) -> ShortenStrategy
    ): ShortenCommand {
        require(!file.isCompiled) { "No sense to collect references for shortening in compiled file $file" }

        val declarationToVisit = file.findSmallestElementOfTypeContainingSelection<KtDeclaration>(selection)
            ?: file

Here are some examples of when that could make sense:

#### A Simple App

And if there's any other style or consistency need, I'll ask directly for that, or I'll add commits on top with the needed changes.

### Check the code

* Check and read the code, see if it makes sense, **run it locally** and see if it actually solves the problem.

* Then **comment** saying that you did that, that's how I will know you really checked it.

!!! info

                operation["callbacks"] = callbacks
            if route.status_code is not None:
                status_code = str(route.status_code)
            else:
                # It would probably make more sense for all response classes to have an
                # explicit default status_code, and to extract it from them, instead of
                # doing this inspection tricks, that would probably be in the future

 * </ul>
 *
 * <h4>"Interfaces", not implementations</h4>
 *
 * <p>These are classes instead of interfaces to prevent external subtyping, but should be thought
 * of as interfaces in every important sense. Each public class such as {@link ImmutableSet} is a
 * <i>type</i> offering meaningful behavioral guarantees. This is substantially different from the