class VersionRangeTest {
    private static final String CHECK_NUM_RESTRICTIONS = "check number of restrictions";

    private static final String CHECK_UPPER_BOUND = "check upper bound";

    private static final String CHECK_UPPER_BOUND_INCLUSIVE = "check upper bound is inclusive";

    private static final String CHECK_LOWER_BOUND = "check lower bound";

    private static final String CHECK_LOWER_BOUND_INCLUSIVE = "check lower bound is inclusive";

        assertEquals(createSet(artifacts), res.getArtifacts(), "Check artifact list");
        assertEquals("1.0", getArtifact("d", res.getArtifacts()).getVersion(), "Check version");
        assertEquals("2.0", getArtifact("b", res.getArtifacts()).getVersion(), "Check version");
    }

    @Test

            // Check if the project is being built during this session, and if we can expect any output.
            // There is no need to check if the build has created any outputs, see MNG-2222.
            boolean projectCompiledDuringThisSession =
                    project.hasLifecyclePhase("compile") && COMPILE_PHASE_TYPES.contains(type);

                    descriptors = Collections.singletonMap(path, name);
                    isModuleHierarchy = false;
                    return;
                }
                // No module descriptor, check manifest file.
                Manifest mf = jar.getManifest();
                if (mf != null) {
                    Object name = mf.getMainAttributes().get(AUTO_MODULE_NAME);

         * gets occasionally extended by newer Maven versions). This imposes the risk for existing plugins to
         * unintentionally use such a magic expression for an ordinary property. So here we check whether we
         * ended up with a magic value that is not compatible with the type of the configured mojo parameter (a string

     * <p>
     * Shortcut for {@code getService(ArtifactManager.class).isSnapshot(...)}.
     * <p>
     * In case there is {@link Artifact} in scope, the recommended way to perform this check is
     * use of {@link Artifact#isSnapshot()} instead.
     *
     * @param version artifact version
     * @return whether the given version is a snapshot
     *

            throws ArtifactResolutionException {
        fireEvent(ResolutionListener.TEST_ARTIFACT, listeners, node);

        Object key = node.getKey();

        // TODO Does this check need to happen here? Had to add the same call
        // below when we iterate on child nodes -- will that suffice?
        if (managedVersions.containsKey(key)) {
            manageArtifact(node, managedVersions, listeners);

        ArtifactVersion matched = null;
        for (ArtifactVersion version : versions) {
            if (containsVersion(version)) {
                // valid - check if it is greater than the currently matched version
                if (matched == null || version.compareTo(matched) > 0) {
                    matched = version;
                }
            }
        }

        return Stream.of(projectProfiles, settingsProfiles, superPomProfiles)
                .flatMap(Function.identity())
                .collect(toSet());
    }

    /**
     * Check whether the required profiles were found in any of the projects we're building or the settings.
     * @param session the Maven session.
     * @param profileActivation the requested optional and required profiles.
     */

  anticipate the inevitable network failures that accompany being physically
  disconnected from the network, and adjust it's behavior accordingly.

  It is more than simply understanding that m2 cannot go and check for the
  latest version of some snapshot artifact. If m2 is offline, SCM operations
  cannot succeed; no artifact downloads can take place, regardless of whether