assertEquals(0, sb2.length());

    try {
      joiner.appendTo(NASTY_APPENDABLE, set);
    } catch (IOException e) {
      throw new AssertionError(e);
    }

    try {
      joiner.appendTo(NASTY_APPENDABLE, set.iterator());
    } catch (IOException e) {
      throw new AssertionError(e);
    }

    try {
      joiner.appendTo(NASTY_APPENDABLE, array);
    } catch (IOException e) {

    assertEquals(0, sb2.length());

    try {
      joiner.appendTo(NASTY_APPENDABLE, set);
    } catch (IOException e) {
      throw new AssertionError(e);
    }

    try {
      joiner.appendTo(NASTY_APPENDABLE, set.iterator());
    } catch (IOException e) {
      throw new AssertionError(e);
    }

    try {
      joiner.appendTo(NASTY_APPENDABLE, array);
    } catch (IOException e) {

                    Predicates.isNull(),
                    Predicates.notNull(),
                    Predicates.in(Arrays.asList(1)))));
    assertEvalsToFalse(nasty);

    Predicate<? super Integer> stillNasty = SerializableTester.reserializeAndAssert(nasty);

    assertEvalsToFalse(stillNasty);
  }

  // enum singleton pattern
  private enum TrimStringFunction implements Function<String, String> {
    INSTANCE;

                    Predicates.isNull(),
                    Predicates.notNull(),
                    Predicates.in(Arrays.asList(1)))));
    assertEvalsToFalse(nasty);

    Predicate<? super Integer> stillNasty = SerializableTester.reserializeAndAssert(nasty);

    assertEvalsToFalse(stillNasty);
  }

  // enum singleton pattern
  private enum TrimStringFunction implements Function<String, String> {
    INSTANCE;

                expectedKind.toLiteralExpression(source, typeAdjustedValue)
            } else {
                this
            }
        // Lastly, we should preserve the resolved type of the original function call.
        return expression.apply {
            replaceConeTypeOrNull(expectedType)
        }
    }

cleanly apply. Conflicts might be trivial which can be resolved easily, when conflicts seem to be non-trivial or touches the part of the code-base the developer is not confident - to get additional clarity reach out to #hack on MinIOHQ slack channel. Hasty changes must be avoided, minor fixes and logs may be added to hotfix branches but this should not be followed as practice.*

Once the **patch** is successfully applied, developer must run tests to validate the fix that was backported by running...

		g.Expect(objs.kind(name.RoleStr).nameMatches(".*gateway.*").size()).Should(Equal(3))
		g.Expect(objs.kind(name.RoleBindingStr).nameMatches(".*gateway.*").size()).Should(Equal(3))
		g.Expect(objs.kind(name.SAStr).nameMatches(".*gateway.*").size()).Should(Equal(3))

		dobj := mustGetDeployment(g, objs, "istio-ingressgateway")
		d := dobj.Unstructured()
		c := dobj.Container("istio-proxy")

      return ((TestMultimapGenerator<K, V, M>) multimapGenerator.getInnerGenerator()).sampleKeys();
    }

    @Override
    public Multiset<K> create(Object... elements) {
      /*
       * This is nasty and complicated, but it's the only way to make sure keys get mapped to enough
       * distinct values.
       */
      Entry<?, ?>[] entries = new Entry<?, ?>[elements.length];

 *       <i>deeply</i> immutable.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <h4>Performance notes</h4>
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Implementations can be generally assumed to prioritize memory efficiency, then speed of
 *       access, and lastly speed of creation.
 *   <li>The {@code copyOf} methods will sometimes recognize that the actual copy operation is
 *       unnecessary; for example, {@code copyOf(copyOf(anArrayList))} should copy the data only

 *       <i>deeply</i> immutable.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <h4>Performance notes</h4>
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Implementations can be generally assumed to prioritize memory efficiency, then speed of
 *       access, and lastly speed of creation.
 *   <li>The {@code copyOf} methods will sometimes recognize that the actual copy operation is
 *       unnecessary; for example, {@code copyOf(copyOf(anArrayList))} should copy the data only