}

            seen = true;

            tg = aTgList;
            Thread[] ts = new Thread[tg.activeCount()];
            tg.enumerate(ts);

            for (Thread active : ts) {
                String name = active.getName();
                boolean daemon = active.isDaemon();
                assertTrue(daemon, name + " is no daemon Thread.");
            }
        }

   *       <ol>
   *         <li>When a thread attaches a listener to a {@code ListenableFuture} that's already
   *             complete, the listener runs immediately in that thread.
   *         <li>When a thread attaches a listener to a {@code ListenableFuture} that's
   *             incomplete and the {@code ListenableFuture} later completes normally, the
   *             listener runs in the thread that completes the {@code ListenableFuture}.

            coordinatorWaiting = false
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }

  /** Start another thread, unless a new thread is already scheduled to start. */
  private fun startAnotherThread() {
    lock.assertHeld()
    if (executeCallCount > runCallCount) return // A thread is still starting.

    executeCallCount++
    backend.execute(this@TaskRunner, runnable)
  }

      throw AssertionError("Thread ${Thread.currentThread().name} MUST hold lock on $this")
    }
  }

  @Suppress("NOTHING_TO_INLINE")
  internal inline fun Any.assertThreadDoesntHoldLock() {
    if (assertionsEnabled && taskRunner.lock.isHeldByCurrentThread) {
      throw AssertionError("Thread ${Thread.currentThread().name} MUST NOT hold lock on $this")
    }
  }

      // unpark even though the thread has already removed itself from the list. But even if we did
      // use a CAS, that race would still exist (it would just be ever so slightly smaller).
      Thread w = thread;
      if (w != null) {
        thread = null;
        LockSupport.unpark(w);
      }
    }
  }

  /**

        static final ThreadGroup GROUP = new ThreadGroup(THREADGROUP_NAME);

        static final AtomicInteger THREAD_NUMBER = new AtomicInteger(1);

        public Thread newThread(Runnable r) {
            Thread newThread = new Thread(GROUP, r, "resolver-" + THREAD_NUMBER.getAndIncrement());
            newThread.setDaemon(true);
            newThread.setContextClassLoader(null);
            return newThread;

    private List<File> filesToDelete = new ArrayList<>();

    private final String baseFilename;

    private final String fileSuffix;

    private StackTraceElement callerInfo;

    private Thread cleanupWarning;

    private boolean warnAboutCleanup = false;

    public TestFileManager(String baseFilename, String fileSuffix) {
        this.baseFilename = baseFilename;
        this.fileSuffix = fileSuffix;

    // Enqueueing the red task starts a thread because the head of the queue changed.
    redQueue.execute("red task") {
      log += "red:starting@${taskFaker.nanoTime}"
      taskFaker.sleep(100.µs)
      log += "red:finishing@${taskFaker.nanoTime}"
    }
    assertThat(taskFaker.executeCallCount).isEqualTo(1)

    // Enqueueing the blue task doesn't start a thread because the red one is still starting.

     * until we send the frame that acknowledges this new size.
     *
     * Since we can't ACK settings on the current reader thread (the reader thread can't write) we
     * execute all peer settings logic on the writer thread. This relies on the fact that the
     * writer task queue won't reorder tasks; otherwise settings could be applied in the opposite
     * order than received.
     */

    assertThat(realTaskRunner.activeQueues()).isNotEmpty()
    Thread.sleep(100)
    val threads = arrayOfNulls<Thread>(Thread.activeCount() * 2)
    Thread.enumerate(threads)
    for (t in threads) {
      if (t != null && t.name == "OkHttp TaskRunner") {
        t.interrupt()
      }
    }
    Thread.sleep(100)
    assertThat(realTaskRunner.activeQueues()).isEmpty()
  }