}

    override val getter: KtPropertyGetterSymbol?
        get() = withValidityAssertion {
            if (descriptor.isDynamic()) return null
            val getter = descriptor.getter ?: return KtFe10DescDefaultPropertyGetterSymbol(descriptor, analysisContext)
            return KtFe10DescPropertyGetterSymbol(getter, analysisContext)
        }

    override val setter: KtPropertySetterSymbol?

        KtPsiBasedSymbolPointer.createForSymbolFromPsi<KtPropertySymbol>(propertyPsi)?.let(::KtPropertyGetterSymbolPointer)
            ?: KtFe10NeverRestoringSymbolPointer()
    }

    override fun equals(other: Any?): Boolean = isEqualTo(other)
    override fun hashCode(): Int = calculateHashCode()

And these models are all sharing a lot of the data and duplicating attribute names and types.

We could do better.

We can declare a `UserBase` model that serves as a base for our other models. And then we can make subclasses of that model that inherit its attributes (type declarations, validation, etc).

### Tested

* 100% <abbr title="The amount of code that is automatically tested">test coverage</abbr>.
* 100% <abbr title="Python type annotations, with this your editor and external tools can give you better support">type annotated</abbr> code base.
* Used in production applications.

## Starlette features

No entanto, você pode fazer isso no **FastAPI**, usando uma das ferramentas internas do Starlette.

A documentação continuaria funcionando, ainda que não adicionaria nenhuma informação dizendo que o parâmetro deveria conter uma rota.

### Conversor de rota

Usando uma opção direta do Starlette você pode declarar um *parâmetro de rota* contendo uma *rota* usando uma URL como:

```
/files/{file_path:path}
```

### 💯

* 1️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ 💯 <abbr title="The amount of code that is automatically tested">💯 💰</abbr>.
* 1️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ 💯 <abbr title="Python type annotations, with this your editor and external tools can give you better support">🆎 ✍</abbr> 📟 🧢.
* ⚙️ 🏭 🈸.

## 💃 ⚒

**FastAPI** 🍕 🔗 ⏮️ (&amp; ⚓️ 🔛) <a href="https://www.starlette.io/" class="external-link" target="_blank"><strong>💃</strong></a>. , 🙆 🌖 💃 📟 👆 ✔️, 🔜 👷.

        get() = withValidityAssertion { psi.isVar }

    override val getter: KtPropertyGetterSymbol
        get() = withValidityAssertion {
            val getter = psi.getter ?: return KtFe10PsiDefaultPropertyGetterSymbol(psi, analysisContext)
            return KtFe10PsiPropertyGetterSymbol(getter, analysisContext)
        }

    override val setter: KtPropertySetterSymbol?
        get() = withValidityAssertion {

        get() = withValidityAssertion { descriptor.setter != null }

    override val setter: KtPropertySetterSymbol?
        get() = withValidityAssertion {
            if (!descriptor.isVar) {
                return null
            }

            val setter = descriptor.setter ?: return KtFe10DescDefaultPropertySetterSymbol(descriptor, analysisContext)
            KtFe10DescPropertySetterSymbol(setter, analysisContext)
        }

When you check the benchmarks, it is common to see several tools of different types compared as equivalent.

Specifically, to see Uvicorn, Starlette and FastAPI compared together (among many other tools).

The simpler the problem solved by the tool, the better performance it will get. And most of the benchmarks don't test the additional features provided by the tool.

The hierarchy is like:

* **Uvicorn**: an ASGI server

val codenarcVersion = if (isGroovy4) "3.1.0-groovy-4.0" else "3.1.0"
val spockVersion = if (isGroovy4) "2.2-groovy-4.0" else "2.2-groovy-3.0"
val asmVersion = "9.7"
// To try out better kotlin compilation avoidance and incremental compilation
// with -Pkotlin.incremental.useClasspathSnapshot=true
val kotlinVersion = providers.gradleProperty("buildKotlinVersion")
    .getOrElse(embeddedKotlinVersion)