private static final class BelowAll extends Cut<Comparable<?>> {
    private static final BelowAll INSTANCE = new BelowAll();

    private BelowAll() {
      /*
       * No code ever sees this bogus value for `endpoint`: This class overrides both methods that
       * use the `endpoint` field, compareTo() and endpoint(). Additionally, the main implementation

   * AtomicInteger results in zero, we compareAndSet the value to zero; if that succeeds, we remove
   * the entry from the Map. If another operation sees a zero in the map, it knows that the entry is
   * about to be removed, so this operation may remove it (often by replacing it with a new
   * AtomicInteger).
   */

  /** The number of occurrences of each element. */

     * platforms we target.
     *
     * 2. Kotlin's Map type has a getOrDefault method that accepts and returns a "plain V," in
     * contrast to the "V?" type that we're using. As a result, Kotlin sees a conflict between the
     * nullness annotations in ImmutableMap and those in its own Map type. In response, it considers
     * the parameter and return type both to be platform types. As a result, Kotlin permits calls

  private static final class BelowAll extends Cut<Comparable<?>> {
    private static final BelowAll INSTANCE = new BelowAll();

    private BelowAll() {
      /*
       * No code ever sees this bogus value for `endpoint`: This class overrides both methods that
       * use the `endpoint` field, compareTo() and endpoint(). Additionally, the main implementation

   * AtomicInteger results in zero, we compareAndSet the value to zero; if that succeeds, we remove
   * the entry from the Map. If another operation sees a zero in the map, it knows that the entry is
   * about to be removed, so this operation may remove it (often by replacing it with a new
   * AtomicInteger).
   */

  /** The number of occurrences of each element. */

     * platforms we target.
     *
     * 2. Kotlin's Map type has a getOrDefault method that accepts and returns a "plain V," in
     * contrast to the "V?" type that we're using. As a result, Kotlin sees a conflict between the
     * nullness annotations in ImmutableMap and those in its own Map type. In response, it considers
     * the parameter and return type both to be platform types. As a result, Kotlin permits calls

       *
       * Accordingly, we have it annotated as returning `Enumeration<? extends Object>` in our
       * prototype checker's JDK. However, the checker still sees the return type as plain
       * `Enumeration<?>`, probably because of one of the following two bugs (and maybe those two
       * bugs are themselves just symptoms of the same underlying problem):
       *