** Deployment mojos

  The concept of deployment is dependent on the availability of a some
  remote repository. Just as above, if that repository is not using
  file:// (which is highly likely to be the case), or the repository is
  not on a local filesystem, deployment will fail when offline.

** Testing mojos

  This can be a problem if the tests are more than simple unit tests;

    reverse(array, fromIndex, toIndex);
  }

  /**
   * Reverses the elements of {@code array}. This is equivalent to {@code
   * Collections.reverse(Doubles.asList(array))}, but is likely to be more efficient.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static void reverse(double[] array) {
    checkNotNull(array);
    reverse(array, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

		var validationErr ldap.Validation
		if errors.As(err, &validationErr) {
			// If we got an LDAP validation error, we need to send appropriate
			// error message back to client (likely mc).
			writeCustomErrorResponseJSON(ctx, w, errorCodes.ToAPIErr(ErrAdminConfigLDAPValidation),
				validationErr.FormatError(), r.URL)
			return
		}

 * there is no guarantee that the domain actually exists on the internet.
 *
 * <p>One common use of this class is to determine whether a given string is likely to represent an
 * addressable domain on the web -- that is, for a candidate string {@code "xxx"}, might browsing to
 * {@code "http://xxx/"} result in a webpage being displayed? In the past, this test was frequently

    }

    private static final long serialVersionUID = 0;
  }

  /**
   * Reverses the elements of {@code array}. This is equivalent to {@code
   * Collections.reverse(Bytes.asList(array))}, but is likely to be more efficient.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static void reverse(byte[] array) {
    checkNotNull(array);
    reverse(array, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

    reverse(array, fromIndex, toIndex);
  }

  /**
   * Reverses the elements of {@code array}. This is equivalent to {@code
   * Collections.reverse(Floats.asList(array))}, but is likely to be more efficient.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static void reverse(float[] array) {
    checkNotNull(array);
    reverse(array, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

        count++;
      }
    }
    return count;
  }

  /**
   * Reverses the elements of {@code array}. This is equivalent to {@code
   * Collections.reverse(Booleans.asList(array))}, but is likely to be more efficient.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static void reverse(boolean[] array) {
    checkNotNull(array);
    reverse(array, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

Quite the opposite - an *aggressively* small feature set is the key feature that makes ztunnel viable.
It very intentionally does not offer L7 (HTTP) functionality, for instance, which would likely violate some of the goals above, without contributing to them.
Instead, the rich functionality that service mesh is traditionally associated with is deferred to the waypoints.

    reverse(array, fromIndex, toIndex);
  }

  /**
   * Reverses the elements of {@code array}. This is equivalent to {@code
   * Collections.reverse(Chars.asList(array))}, but is likely to be more efficient.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static void reverse(char[] array) {
    checkNotNull(array);
    reverse(array, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

        ) {}
      }

    val trustManager = get().platformTrustManager()
    val sslContext = get().newSSLContext()
    sslContext.init(null, null, null)

    // new client, may share all same fields but likely different connection pool
    assertNotSame(
      client.routeDatabase,
      OkHttpClient.Builder()
        .build()
        .routeDatabase,
    )

    // same client with no change affecting route db