of an "if", "for", or "switch" statement, and the composite literal
is not enclosed in parentheses, square brackets, or curly braces.
In this rare case, the opening brace of the literal is erroneously parsed
as the one introducing the block of statements. To resolve the ambiguity,
the composite literal must appear within parentheses.
</p>

<pre>
if x == (T{a,b,c}[i]) { … }
if (x == T{a,b,c}[i]) { … }

<pre>
type T[P *C] …
type T[P (C)] …
type T[P *C|Q] …
…
</pre>

<p>
In these rare cases, the type parameter list is indistinguishable from an
expression and the type declaration is parsed as an array type declaration.
To resolve the ambiguity, embed the constraint in an
<a href="#Interface_types">interface</a> or use a trailing comma:
</p>

<pre>
type T[P interface{*C}] …
type T[P *C,] …

The new [ParseCookie] function parses a Cookie header value and
returns all the cookies which were set in it. Since the same cookie
name can appear multiple times the returned Values can contain
more than one value for a given key.

The new [ParseSetCookie] function parses a Set-Cookie header value and