agrjnevvad--nx?ikhvlaraeb--nx???7k-antouvacchb--nx?8&k-rekie-erv--nx?l-ladrua-rs--nx?m-darehsdrk--nx??a!.sg??bct-eimeuvejsemn--nx?d&do?iisevvad?lov?narts?uas??f&1-&l--nx?s--nx??2-h--nx??g&10aq0-ineve--nx?av?ev?lot?r&ajn&evvad?u??ájn&evvad?u????h?iz-lf--nx?j&ddadab?sel??k&el?hoj&sarak?šárák??iiv&ag&na&el?g??ŋ&ael?ág???ran???l&f?lahrevo?o&ms?s??sennev?t-&ilm--nx?tom--nx??u&-edr--nx?s??øms??muar?n&0-tsr--nx?2-dob--nx?5-&asir--nx?tals--nx??a&r!-i-om?f?t??t??douvsatvid?kiv?m&os?øs??n&od?ød??ra?sen?t&...

      ListenableFuture<? extends V>... futures) {
    /*
     * Another way to express this signature would be to bound <V> by @NonNull and accept
     * LF<? extends @Nullable V>. That might be better: There's currently no difference between the
     * outputs users get when calling this with <Foo> and calling it with <@Nullable Foo>. The only

      cache.edit(key)
    }.also { expected ->
      assertThat(expected.message).isEqualTo("keys must match regex [a-z0-9_-]{1,120}: \"$key\"")
    }
    assertFailsWith<IllegalArgumentException> {
      key = "has_LF\n"
      cache.edit(key)
    }.also { expected ->
      assertThat(expected.message).isEqualTo("keys must match regex [a-z0-9_-]{1,120}: \"$key\"")
    }
    assertFailsWith<IllegalArgumentException> {