Serialization.getFieldSetter(TreeMultiset.class, "rootReference")
        .set(this, new Reference<AvlNode<E>>());
    AvlNode<E> header = new AvlNode<>();
    Serialization.getFieldSetter(TreeMultiset.class, "header").set(this, header);
    successor(header, header);
    Serialization.populateMultiset(this, stream);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // not needed in emulated source
  @J2ktIncompatible

  /*
   * This method was rewritten in Java from an intermediate step of the Murmur hash function in
   * http://code.google.com/p/smhasher/source/browse/trunk/MurmurHash3.cpp, which contained the
   * following header:
   *
   * MurmurHash3 was written by Austin Appleby, and is placed in the public domain. The author
   * hereby disclaims copyright to this source code.
   */
  static int smear(int hashCode) {

     * key and value, which we pass to the superconstructor, even though the key and value type for
     * a given entry might not include null. The right fix for the header problems is probably to
     * define a separate MultimapLink interface with a separate "header" implementation, which
     * hopefully could avoid implementing Entry or ValueSetLink at all. (But note that that approach

 *
 * @author Kurt Alfred Kluever
 */
public class HttpHeadersTest extends TestCase {

  public void testConstantNameMatchesString() throws Exception {
    // Special case some of the weird HTTP Header names...
    ImmutableBiMap<String, String> specialCases =
        ImmutableBiMap.<String, String>builder()
            .put("CDN_LOOP", "CDN-Loop")
            .put("ETAG", "ETag")
            .put("SOURCE_MAP", "SourceMap")

  /*
   * This method was rewritten in Java from an intermediate step of the Murmur hash function in
   * http://code.google.com/p/smhasher/source/browse/trunk/MurmurHash3.cpp, which contained the
   * following header:
   *
   * MurmurHash3 was written by Austin Appleby, and is placed in the public domain. The author
   * hereby disclaims copyright to this source code.
   */
  static int smear(int hashCode) {

  public static final String ACCESS_CONTROL_REQUEST_HEADERS = "Access-Control-Request-Headers";
  /** The HTTP {@code Access-Control-Request-Method} header field name. */
  public static final String ACCESS_CONTROL_REQUEST_METHOD = "Access-Control-Request-Method";
  /** The HTTP {@code Authorization} header field name. */
  public static final String AUTHORIZATION = "Authorization";

            : EnumMultiset.create(asList(elements));
      }
    };
  }

  private enum Color {
    BLUE,
    RED,
    YELLOW,
    GREEN,
    WHITE
  }

  private enum Gender {
    MALE,
    FEMALE
  }

  public void testClassCreate() {
    Multiset<Color> ms = EnumMultiset.create(Color.class);
    ms.add(Color.RED);
    ms.add(Color.YELLOW);
    ms.add(Color.RED);

      }
    }
  }

  private enum Gender {
    MALE,
    FEMALE
  }

  private static class AllDefaultValuesChecker extends DefaultValueChecker {

    @SuppressWarnings("unused") // called by NullPointerTester
    public void checkDefaultValuesForTheseTypes(
        Gender gender,
        Integer integer,
        int i,
        String string,

import com.google.common.reflect.Reflection;
import com.google.common.reflect.TypeToken;
import java.io.ByteArrayInputStream;
import java.io.File;
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.io.Reader;
import java.io.StringReader;
import java.lang.annotation.ElementType;
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;

 *
 * <p>Technically one <i>can</i> create a 128bit IPv6 address with the wire format of a "mapped"
 * address, as shown above, and transmit it in an IPv6 packet header. However, Java's InetAddress
 * creation methods appear to adhere doggedly to the original intent of the "mapped" address: all
 * "mapped" addresses return {@link Inet4Address} objects.
 *