* which are <i>not the caller's fault</i>. Doing so is <b>not recommended</b> because it is
 * misleading to future readers of the code and of stack traces. See <a
 * href="https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/ConditionalFailuresExplained">Conditional failures
 * explained</a> in the Guava User Guide for more advice. Notably, {@link Verify} offers assertions

 *
 * <p>A call to any of the <i>enter</i> methods with <b>void</b> return type should always be
 * followed immediately by a <i>try/finally</i> block to ensure that the current thread leaves the
 * monitor cleanly:
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * monitor.enter();
 * try {
 *   // do things while occupying the monitor
 * } finally {
 *   monitor.leave();
 * }
 * }</pre>
 *

    /**
     * When potential deadlock is detected, this policy results in the throwing of the {@code
     * PotentialDeadlockException} indicating the potential deadlock, which includes stack traces
     * illustrating the cycle in lock acquisition order.
     */
    THROW {
      @Override
      public void handlePotentialDeadlock(PotentialDeadlockException e) {
        throw e;
      }
    },

   * the full, recursive stack trace of {@code throwable}. Note that you probably should not be
   * parsing the resulting string; if you need programmatic access to the stack frames, you can call
   * {@link Throwable#getStackTrace()}.
   */
  @GwtIncompatible // java.io.PrintWriter, java.io.StringWriter
  public static String getStackTraceAsString(Throwable throwable) {

   * the full, recursive stack trace of {@code throwable}. Note that you probably should not be
   * parsing the resulting string; if you need programmatic access to the stack frames, you can call
   * {@link Throwable#getStackTrace()}.
   */
  @GwtIncompatible // java.io.PrintWriter, java.io.StringWriter
  public static String getStackTraceAsString(Throwable throwable) {

        || (stimuli.length >= 5 && removes > 2)) {
      // removes are the most expensive thing to test, since they often throw exceptions with stack
      // traces, so we test them a bit less aggressively
      return;
    }

    MultiExceptionListIterator reference = new MultiExceptionListIterator(expectedElements);
    I target = newTargetIterator();

   *
   * <p><b>Comparison to {@code java.util.Optional}:</b> this class leaves the specific choice of
   * hash code unspecified, unlike the Java 8+ equivalent.
   */
  @Override
  public abstract int hashCode();

  /**
   * Returns a string representation for this instance.
   *
   * <p><b>Comparison to {@code java.util.Optional}:</b> this class leaves the specific string

        || (stimuli.length >= 5 && removes > 2)) {
      // removes are the most expensive thing to test, since they often throw exceptions with stack
      // traces, so we test them a bit less aggressively
      return;
    }

    MultiExceptionListIterator reference = new MultiExceptionListIterator(expectedElements);
    I target = newTargetIterator();

          && Modifier.isPublic(method.getModifiers()) // only the public methods
          && method.getParameterTypes().length == 0 // only the seed-less grapes^W hash functions
          && !legacyHashingMethodNames.contains(method.getName())) {
        HashFunction hashFunction = (HashFunction) method.invoke(Hashing.class);
        assertTrue(

  @ParametricNullness
  private V getDoneValue(Object obj) throws ExecutionException {
    // While this seems like it might be too branch-y, simple benchmarking proves it to be
    // unmeasurable (comparing done AbstractFutures with immediateFuture)
    if (obj instanceof Cancellation) {
      throw cancellationExceptionWithCause("Task was cancelled.", ((Cancellation) obj).cause);