### Burger Conclusion

In this scenario of "fast food burgers with your crush", as there is a lot of waiting 🕙, it makes a lot more sense to have a concurrent system ⏸🔀⏯.

This is the case for most of the web applications.

Many, many users, but your server is waiting 🕙 for their not-so-good connection to send their requests.

And then waiting 🕙 again for the responses to come back.

### Parallele Hamburger

Stellen wir uns jetzt vor, dass es sich hierbei nicht um „nebenläufige Hamburger“, sondern um „parallele Hamburger“ handelt.

Sie gehen los mit Ihrem Schwarm, um paralleles Fast Food zu bekommen.

Sie stehen in der Schlange, während mehrere (sagen wir acht) Kassierer, die gleichzeitig Köche sind, die Bestellungen der Leute vor Ihnen entgegennehmen.

Le fast-food a 8 processeurs (serveurs/cuisiniers) 👨‍🍳👨‍🍳👨‍🍳👨‍🍳👨‍🍳👨‍🍳👨‍🍳👨‍🍳. Alors que le fast-food de burgers concurrents en avait 2 (un serveur et un cuisinier).

Et pourtant l'expérience finale n'est pas meilleure 😞.

---

### Parallel Hamburgerler

Şimdi bunların "Eşzamanlı Hamburger" değil, "Paralel Hamburger" olduğunu düşünelim.

Hamburger 🍔 almak için 😍 aşkınla Paralel fast food'a gidiyorsun.

Birden fazla kasiyer varken (varsayalım 8) sıraya girdiniz👩‍🍳👨‍🍳👩‍🍳👨‍🍳👩‍🍳👨‍🍳👩‍🍳👨‍🍳 ve sıranız gelene kadar bekliyorsunuz.

  // It does not support `*`.
  // Trailing slashes are trimmed when validating the path prefix with a host path.
  //
  // Examples:
  // `/foo` would allow `/foo`, `/foo/` and `/foo/bar`
  // `/foo` would not allow `/food` or `/etc/foo`
  optional string pathPrefix = 1;

  // when set to true, will allow host volumes matching the pathPrefix only if all volume mounts are readOnly.
  // +optional
  optional bool readOnly = 2;
}

    rare occasion we may reject it.

**3. Review**

-   For a valid PR, reviewer (person familiar with the code/functionality)
    checks if the PR looks good or needs additional changes.
-   If all looks good, the reviewer will approve the PR.
-   If a change is needed, the contributor is requested to make the suggested
    change.
-   You make the change and submit it for the review again.

  return if (address is InetSocketAddress) address.hostName else address.toString()
}

/**
 * Returns true if new reads and writes should be attempted on this.
 *
 * Unfortunately Java's networking APIs don't offer a good health check, so we go on our own by
 * attempting to read with a short timeout. If the fails immediately we know the socket is
 * unhealthy.
 *
 * @param source the source used to read bytes from the socket.
 */

### Understand the problem

* First, make sure you **understand the problem** that the pull request is trying to solve. It might have a longer discussion in a GitHub Discussion or issue.

* There's also a good chance that the pull request is not actually needed because the problem can be solved in a **different way**. Then you can suggest or ask about that.

### Don't worry about style

     * both say in their comments that they're not really sure what the right approach is. We go
     * with Chrome's behavior (which also experimentally seems to match what IE does), but if you
     * actually want to have a good chance of things working, please avoid double-quotes, newlines,
     * percent signs, and the like in your field names.
     */
    internal fun StringBuilder.appendQuotedString(key: String) {
      append('"')

    prefer the JDK’s precedence order.) This change may cause your HTTP calls to negotiate a
    different cipher suite than before! OkHttp's defaults cipher suites are selected for good
    security and performance.

 *  New: `ConnectionListener` publishes events for connects, disconnects, and use of pooled
    connections.