}

    public void setDevelopers(List<Developer> developers) {
        getModel().setDevelopers(developers);
    }

    public List<Developer> getDevelopers() {
        return getModel().getDevelopers();
    }

    public void addDeveloper(Developer developer) {
        getModel().addDeveloper(developer);
    }

    public void setContributors(List<Contributor> contributors) {

        assertEquals(1, ((List<?>) pom.getValue("developers")).size());
        assertEquals("dev", pom.getValue("developers[1]/id"));
        assertEquals("project-developer", pom.getValue("developers[1]/name"));
        assertEquals("developer@", pom.getValue("developers[1]/email"));
        assertEquals("https://developer", pom.getValue("developers[1]/url"));
        assertEquals("developer", pom.getValue("developers[1]/organization"));

build:cuda_clang --config=cuda
# Enable TensorRT optimizations https://developer.nvidia.com/tensorrt
build:cuda_clang --config=tensorrt
build:cuda_clang --action_env=TF_CUDA_CLANG="1"
build:cuda_clang --@local_config_cuda//:cuda_compiler=clang
# Select supported compute capabilities (supported graphics cards).
# This is the same as the official TensorFlow builds.
# See https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda-gpus#compute

    ask_cuda_compute_capabilities = (
        'Please specify a list of comma-separated CUDA compute capabilities '
        'you want to build with.\nYou can find the compute capability of your '
        'device at: https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda-gpus. Each capability '
        'can be specified as "x.y" or "compute_xy" to include both virtual and'
        ' binary GPU code, or as "sm_xy" to only include the binary '

   * nullness checker can already "prove" are non-null. That means that the first parameter to
   * checkNotNull *should* be annotated to require it to be non-null.
   *
   * However, for a variety of reasons, Google developers have written a ton of code over the past
   * decade that assumes that they can use checkNotNull for non-precondition checks. I had hoped to

   * nullness checker can already "prove" are non-null. That means that the first parameter to
   * checkNotNull *should* be annotated to require it to be non-null.
   *
   * However, for a variety of reasons, Google developers have written a ton of code over the past
   * decade that assumes that they can use checkNotNull for non-precondition checks. I had hoped to